H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Denis Kudla vs Tobias Kamke H2H: 1-1
Denis Kudla and Tobias Kamke are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Denis Kudla won the 2012 Indian Wells Masters first round 2-6 7-6(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 40
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2018* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q2 | Hard | Denis Kudla | 6-2 7-5 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2012* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Denis Kudla | 2-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
| Feb 20, 2012 | Memphis | ATP 250 | Q1 | Hard | Denis Kudla | 6-1 6-4 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2011* | Washington | ATP 500 | R64 | Hard | Tobias Kamke | 6-4 6-2 | Denis Kudla | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denis Kudla | #1,269 | #53 | 858 | 1,836 | 71 | 131 | 35.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tobias Kamke | #1,114 | #64 | 744 | 1,764 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denis Kudla | Tobias Kamke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #496 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #276 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #114 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #121 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #69 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #131 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #63 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #96 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #114 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #105 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #106 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #277 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #163 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2024 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #267 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |