H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Denis Shapovalov vs Bradley Klahn H2H: 1-0
Denis Shapovalov holds a 1–0 lead over Bradley Klahn in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Denis Shapovalov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Denis Shapovalov won the 2019 Chengdu fourth round 3-6 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Canada
Age 27
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 35
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2019* | Chengdu | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Denis Shapovalov | 3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | Bradley Klahn | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denis Shapovalov | #39 | #10 | 3,625 | 2,011 | 224 | 190 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Bradley Klahn | #1,096 | #63 | 731 | 1,733 | 13 | 43 | 23.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denis Shapovalov | Bradley Klahn | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #27 | 1,868 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #798 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 2,002 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #669 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #248 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,904 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #18 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #148 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2024 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #56 | 1,887 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2025 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #23 | 1,791 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2026 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #877 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |