H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Diego Schwartzman vs Antonio Veic.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Schwartzman | 7-5 6-2 | Antonio Veic | Match data | Feb 25, 2013 | Q2 | Mexican Open | ATP 500 | Clay |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diego Schwartzman | #879 | #8 | 3,765 | 2,062 | 240 | 212 | 53.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Antonio Veic | #888 | #119 | 468 | 1,718 | 10 | 22 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diego Schwartzman | Antonio Veic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #117 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #61 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #220 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #88 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #191 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #26 | 1,964 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #17 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #14 | 1,953 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #9 | 2,014 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #473 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #13 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,624 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #884 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Diego Schwartzman | Antonio Veic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | 2013 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2010 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2011 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 21 | 13 | 34 | 61.8% | 17 | 12 | 29 | 58.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2012 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2018 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% | 17 | 9 | 26 | 65.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2019 | 22 | 13 | 35 | 62.9% | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 23 | 12 | 35 | 65.7% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 20 | 10 | 30 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 114 | 101 | 215 | 53.0% | 116 | 95 | 211 | 55.0% | 10 | 16 | 26 | 38.5% | — | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 5 | 13 | 18 | 27.8% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 448/452 of Diego Schwartzman's and 32/32 of Antonio Veic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Diego Schwartzman | Antonio Veic | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | 2013 | 6/6 | 1.0 | 4.2 | 69.3% | 55.0% | 45.2% | 50.9% | 44.7% | 52.0% | 37.9% | 2008 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 52.2% | 62.9% | 34.4% | 64.3% | 66.7% | 49.3% | 38.5% |
| 21 | 2014 | 6/6 | 0.7 | 2.2 | 60.1% | 56.8% | 50.2% | 43.3% | 53.9% | 53.8% | 42.9% | 2009 | 3/3 | 6.3 | 3.7 | 56.6% | 69.5% | 52.4% | 71.5% | 56.7% | 62.0% | 35.8% |
| 22 | 2015 | 31/31 | 2.8 | 3.2 | 58.1% | 63.7% | 50.9% | 50.3% | 47.1% | 58.1% | 39.2% | 2010 | 4/4 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 66.2% | 63.9% | 57.3% | 55.4% | 62.6% | 61.4% | 36.5% |
| 23 | 2016 | 34/34 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 61.6% | 66.6% | 50.3% | 56.4% | 47.8% | 60.4% | 40.5% | 2011 | 10/10 | 4.5 | 3.1 | 58.5% | 63.2% | 42.4% | 48.2% | 54.4% | 54.3% | 39.1% |
| 24 | 2017 | 65/65 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 60.9% | 66.5% | 52.3% | 52.5% | 46.6% | 61.0% | 44.0% | 2012 | 8/8 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 64.3% | 68.9% | 47.9% | 50.4% | 47.1% | 61.5% | 40.2% |
| 25 | 2018 | 55/55 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 61.0% | 69.0% | 50.4% | 57.2% | 42.9% | 61.6% | 41.4% | 2013 | 5/5 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 66.3% | 56.3% | 43.2% | 30.8% | 39.3% | 51.0% | 31.6% |
| 26 | 2019 | 63/63 | 2.0 | 2.9 | 64.2% | 67.5% | 51.1% | 55.6% | 42.9% | 61.9% | 41.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 36/37 | 1.4 | 3.1 | 61.9% | 65.9% | 49.4% | 55.4% | 46.4% | 59.5% | 43.4% | 2015 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 65.6% | 62.5% | 28.6% | 55.6% | 25.0% | 50.8% | 33.3% |
| 28 | 2021 | 53/56 | 1.5 | 2.8 | 63.6% | 68.1% | 51.7% | 58.0% | 47.1% | 62.0% | 42.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 51/51 | 1.1 | 4.0 | 67.7% | 62.7% | 48.1% | 56.5% | 42.6% | 58.0% | 41.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 38/38 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 67.4% | 60.5% | 46.8% | 53.4% | 42.8% | 56.2% | 36.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 8/8 | 1.0 | 2.9 | 64.0% | 58.3% | 41.2% | 37.4% | 34.0% | 51.6% | 36.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 65.5% | 57.0% | 47.0% | 57.5% | 21.0% | 53.5% | 32.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 448/452 | 1.9 | 3.0 | 63.1% | 65.5% | 50.1% | 54.7% | 44.8% | 59.8% | 41.4% | — | 32/32 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 62.0% | 64.2% | 46.0% | 49.8% | 50.9% | 56.9% | 37.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Diego Schwartzman | Antonio Veic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2011 | 1498 | 103.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 1490 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1453 | 90.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 1588 | 128.5 | -4.31 | +0.42 | 0.790 | 45.4% | — | +70 | — | 26.7% | -1.40 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.04 | 2008 | 1445 | 99.2 | -0.85 | -5.19 | 0.758 | 44.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.17 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1607 | 130.1 | -1.60 | +2.41 | 0.927 | 48.6% | — | +77 | — | 37.5% | -0.31 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.40 | 2009 | 1469 | 110.3 | +0.50 | +0.45 | 0.943 | 49.3% | +81 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.13 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.06 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1721 | 143.4 | -3.91 | +2.17 | 0.937 | 48.7% | -113 | +20 | — | 41.6% | -0.44 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–6 (40%) | — | -0.75 | 2010 | 1532 | 107.8 | -2.29 | -0.16 | 0.946 | 48.7% | +46 | — | — | 30.0% | -0.50 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | -0.20 |
| 23 | 2016 | 1782 | 145.0 | -2.62 | +3.15 | 1.022 | 50.3% | -79 | +21 | — | 49.4% | +0.03 | 5–5 (50%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | -1.35 | 2011 | 1671 | 121.9 | -3.75 | +0.44 | 0.855 | 46.8% | -50 | +63 | — | 34.6% | -0.81 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.16 |
| 24 | 2017 | 1965 | 163.8 | -2.03 | +6.93 | 1.127 | 52.1% | -31 | -87 | — | 58.1% | +0.60 | 9–12 (43%) | 8–12 (40%) | — | +0.94 | 2012 | 1642 | 118.3 | -1.65 | -0.78 | 1.045 | 50.7% | -22 | +89 | — | 42.1% | +0.11 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | +0.12 |
| 25 | 2018 | 1875 | 160.3 | -1.61 | +5.07 | 1.079 | 51.3% | +2 | +85 | -361 | 53.1% | +0.36 | 9–5 (64%) | 4–8 (33%) | — | +0.44 | 2013 | 1583 | 108.5 | -3.24 | -2.73 | 0.645 | 41.5% | — | +148 | — | 16.7% | -2.75 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | -0.12 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1954 | 161.3 | -1.81 | +5.41 | 1.097 | 51.6% | -18 | +23 | -317 | 58.1% | +0.63 | 15–7 (68%) | 13–11 (54%) | — | +2.19 | 2014 | 1599 | 115.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 2014 | 165.7 | -1.69 | +5.89 | 1.071 | 51.5% | -94 | +94 | — | 61.9% | +0.76 | 9–3 (75%) | 10–4 (71%) | — | -1.52 | 2015 | 1549 | 102.7 | -1.93 | -0.71 | 0.678 | 42.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.11 |
| 28 | 2021 | 1960 | 156.2 | -0.65 | +5.20 | 1.122 | 52.0% | -3 | +102 | -284 | 63.5% | +0.86 | 8–8 (50%) | 7–3 (70%) | — | +2.93 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 1801 | 148.1 | -4.38 | +4.65 | 0.986 | 49.8% | +17 | +229 | -159 | 50.0% | +0.08 | 14–5 (74%) | 10–12 (45%) | — | +2.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 1746 | 140.4 | -5.20 | +0.72 | 0.841 | 46.7% | +19 | +97 | -91 | 39.3% | -0.67 | 4–5 (44%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | -0.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 1624 | 111.2 | -5.97 | -0.90 | 0.755 | 43.9% | +79 | +96 | — | 19.0% | -2.57 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–0 | — | +0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 1631 | 106.5 | -2.61 | -2.26 | 0.699 | 43.5% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.20 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2062 | 158.0 | -2.57 | +4.47 | 1.029 | 50.5% | -23 | +68 | -242 | 52.9% | +0.25 | 79–62 (56%) | 69–69 (50%) | 102.1 | +1.02 | — | 1718 | 116.9 | -2.42 | -0.65 | 0.868 | 47.2% | +14 | +92 | — | 32.9% | -0.89 | 7–6 (54%) | 1–9 (10%) | 97.1 | +0.56 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rafael Nadal | 1 | 10 | 11 | Jun 10, 2021 | H2H |
| Casper Ruud | 5 | 4 | 9 | Mar 11, 2023 | H2H |
| Dominic Thiem | 3 | 5 | 8 | Oct 8, 2020 | H2H |
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 5 | 2 | 7 | Aug 11, 2022 | H2H |
| Novak Djokovic | 0 | 7 | 7 | May 31, 2022 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blaz Kavcic | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 25, 2012 | H2H |
| James Ward | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 5, 2015 | H2H |
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 31, 2013 | H2H |
| Viktor Troicki | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 25, 2013 | H2H |
| Henri Laaksonen | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 11, 2013 | H2H |