H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Dominic Thiem vs Alexandr Dolgopolov H2H: 2-1
Dominic Thiem holds a 2–1 lead over Alexandr Dolgopolov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dominic Thiem leads 1–0 on clay, while Alexandr Dolgopolov leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2016 Rome Masters second round 6-3 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2016* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Dominic Thiem | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Alexandr Dolgopolov | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2015* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Alexandr Dolgopolov | 6-3 6-3 | Dominic Thiem | Match data |
| Oct 29, 2014* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Dominic Thiem | 6-2 4-6 6-0 | Alexandr Dolgopolov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Alexandr Dolgopolov | #508 | #13 | 2,030 | 2,020 | 215 | 200 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominic Thiem | Alexandr Dolgopolov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #48 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #15 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,890 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 | 2014 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 | 2015 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 | 2016 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #62 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 | 2017 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 | 2018 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |