H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Dominic Thiem vs Matthew Ebden H2H: 0-1

Matthew Ebden holds a 1–0 lead over Dominic Thiem in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Matthew Ebden leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Matthew Ebden won the 2018 Shanghai Masters second round 6-4 6-7(8) 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominic Thiem
AUT Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Matthew Ebden
AUS Age 38 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Matthew Ebden #51 6-4 6-7(8) 7-6(4) Dominic Thiem #7 Match data Oct 10, 2018* R32 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,240 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17
Matthew Ebden #970 #39 1,134 1,849 75 129 36.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominic Thiem Matthew Ebden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,852 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,891 0 3 — — — — — — —
22 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,005 0 7 2010 1–2 33.3% #196 1,526 0 0
23 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8 2011 10–10 50.0% #86 1,762 0 0
24 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,066 0 11 2012 15–23 39.5% #105 1,644 0 0
25 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,143 0 16 2013 4–11 26.7% #68 1,634 0 0
26 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,201 1 17 2014 5–21 19.2% #231 1,539 0 0
27 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17 2015 1–6 14.3% #105 1,631 0 0
28 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17 2016 0–4 0.0% #698 1,573 0 0
29 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17 2017 9–7 56.2% #76 1,739 0 0
30 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,628 1 17 2018 19–22 46.3% #46 1,790 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2019 5–16 23.8% #244 1,654 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2021 6–5 54.5% #237 1,591 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #740 1,527 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2024 0–1 0.0% — 1,526 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dominic Thiem Matthew Ebden
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 14 16 30 46.7% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 25 15 40 62.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0% 2010 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2017 21 19 40 52.5% 22 5 27 81.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2011 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
24 2018 23 11 34 67.6% 26 8 34 76.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2012 14 16 30 46.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
25 2019 25 9 34 73.5% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2020 18 5 23 78.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2014 4 12 16 25.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 2021 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2022 11 7 18 61.1% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 2016 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2017 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 12 16 28 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 161 115 276 58.3% 161 74 235 68.5% 15 18 33 45.5% — 55 89 144 38.2% 1 14 15 6.7% 19 26 45 42.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 539/544 of Dominic Thiem's and 203/203 of Matthew Ebden's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dominic Thiem Matthew Ebden
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 4/4 4.0 2.8 48.1% 75.6% 37.4% 48.4% 86.1% 55.7% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 3/3 5.0 3.0 61.3% 75.2% 45.6% 73.5% 38.9% 63.6% 28.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 6/6 5.8 2.5 54.7% 78.5% 62.7% 58.8% 39.6% 70.9% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 44/45 4.4 2.9 57.3% 72.6% 50.7% 58.4% 41.6% 62.9% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 62/62 5.9 2.3 56.6% 74.8% 56.2% 58.9% 35.8% 66.5% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 80/82 5.9 2.9 61.4% 74.3% 54.1% 56.1% 40.5% 66.4% 37.4% 2010 3/3 6.3 1.0 66.7% 72.6% 58.1% 64.3% 61.7% 67.6% 31.2%
23 2017 74/74 6.1 3.1 58.8% 75.2% 52.6% 61.5% 41.3% 65.9% 38.5% 2011 20/20 5.8 2.7 61.6% 72.0% 47.9% 47.2% 36.9% 63.0% 35.9%
24 2018 70/71 7.3 3.5 58.8% 75.9% 53.3% 63.4% 39.3% 66.5% 38.4% 2012 38/38 5.4 4.1 62.3% 68.9% 44.8% 52.5% 33.0% 59.8% 34.5%
25 2019 64/65 4.8 2.1 65.8% 73.6% 56.2% 60.7% 45.4% 67.6% 38.0% 2013 15/15 5.6 5.7 56.5% 73.1% 45.0% 50.4% 30.9% 61.0% 34.2%
26 2020 31/31 7.1 2.8 63.4% 74.0% 53.5% 64.3% 43.8% 66.4% 38.0% 2014 26/26 4.4 6.2 57.7% 68.5% 39.2% 44.0% 37.7% 55.6% 32.2%
27 2021 16/16 4.6 2.6 63.9% 72.8% 54.3% 66.1% 46.9% 66.2% 36.4% 2015 7/7 7.1 5.0 58.8% 71.7% 51.1% 63.2% 44.0% 62.9% 32.2%
28 2022 34/34 4.3 2.2 63.3% 68.8% 52.8% 50.6% 35.6% 63.3% 36.5% 2016 4/4 2.8 3.8 53.6% 51.5% 39.7% 44.0% 45.5% 46.2% 25.6%
29 2023 41/41 5.4 2.9 60.8% 72.2% 52.2% 61.4% 33.1% 64.3% 34.1% 2017 16/16 4.7 4.4 64.7% 71.6% 47.8% 54.0% 39.3% 63.1% 38.2%
30 2024 10/10 5.9 3.3 58.0% 67.4% 53.0% 48.4% 38.6% 61.4% 27.8% 2018 41/41 7.5 5.3 59.7% 72.5% 50.1% 59.9% 42.6% 63.3% 35.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 21/21 7.0 6.0 59.8% 71.7% 42.0% 54.0% 46.1% 59.9% 35.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 11/11 4.3 3.3 62.6% 71.7% 48.9% 64.3% 49.0% 62.5% 34.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 1/1 5.0 3.0 69.2% 83.3% 54.2% 0.0% 50.0% 74.4% 27.4%
Career — 539/544 5.7 2.8 60.4% 73.8% 53.6% 59.6% 40.4% 65.7% 37.2% — 203/204 5.8 4.7 60.4% 70.7% 46.0% 53.2% 39.6% 60.8% 34.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dominic Thiem Matthew Ebden
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2010 1491 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2011 1496 112.5 -2.63 -3.33 0.753 45.1% +32 — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1487 106.1 +0.37 -3.45 0.794 48.0% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1580 124.6 +2.00 -0.38 1.319 54.2% -19 -9 — 64.3% +1.29 1–1 0–1 — +0.35 2007 1500 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 1853 150.8 -0.10 +1.26 1.001 49.9% -30 -16 — 50.0% -0.09 8–8 (50%) 9–6 (60%) — -1.38 2008 1486 97.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 1892 154.0 +1.96 +1.24 1.108 51.3% -65 +157 -301 51.8% +0.13 10–9 (53%) 17–24 (41%) — +0.34 2009 1490 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 2006 168.6 +3.18 +1.63 1.114 51.5% -61 +166 -227 63.5% +0.71 21–3 (88%) 20–14 (59%) — -0.64 2010 1526 117.9 +1.93 +0.66 0.965 49.8% +20 — — 28.6% -0.57 — — — -0.49
23 2017 1959 167.8 +2.96 +2.51 1.131 52.0% -82 +337 -151 63.7% +0.80 7–12 (37%) 14–14 (50%) — +0.76 2011 1762 127.8 +1.26 -1.35 0.971 49.6% -32 — -47 44.4% -0.42 4–1 (80%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.59
24 2018 2067 169.1 +3.22 +2.98 1.147 52.2% -45 +195 -279 66.7% +0.99 14–5 (74%) 17–14 (55%) — +0.03 2012 1645 128.5 -2.57 -1.66 0.858 47.3% +15 -179 +28 39.8% -0.69 9–5 (64%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.07
25 2019 2144 172.9 +3.94 +3.40 1.174 52.5% -34 +136 — 65.6% +0.78 14–3 (82%) 16–12 (57%) — -1.32 2013 1635 122.7 -1.51 -1.64 0.876 47.9% +18 — — 31.6% -1.24 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.71
26 2020 2202 171.1 +4.24 +2.58 1.132 52.4% +10 +19 — 69.1% +1.14 7–3 (70%) 15–9 (63%) — -2.09 2014 1540 122.0 -6.43 -2.74 0.726 44.3% +30 -112 +36 26.2% -1.63 3–4 (43%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.48
27 2021 2015 141.5 +1.76 +0.56 1.075 51.5% +142 +122 — 52.3% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.26 2015 1631 122.0 -2.35 -0.31 0.869 48.1% -24 — +48 30.0% -0.35 0–3 (0%) 0–6 (0%) — +0.22
28 2022 1908 145.5 +0.24 +0.10 0.994 49.8% +149 +46 — 47.6% -0.26 10–5 (67%) 14–4 (78%) — -2.20 2016 1573 113.0 -4.76 -3.67 0.476 37.3% -25 — — 12.5% -3.13 — — — +0.28
29 2023 1800 137.0 -0.18 -1.41 0.957 49.4% +72 +55 — 47.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 10–10 (50%) — -1.03 2017 1739 127.4 -1.27 +2.03 1.034 50.6% -69 — +46 50.0% +0.21 5–1 (83%) 2–5 (29%) — +1.33
30 2024 1628 110.1 -2.09 -4.22 0.720 45.2% +169 +71 — 19.2% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.23 2018 1791 148.3 -0.68 +0.04 0.958 49.3% -42 — +64 47.1% -0.21 6–6 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.04
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1654 126.9 -3.44 +0.06 0.888 47.9% +33 — +98 33.3% -0.87 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.35
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1631 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1592 115.4 +0.31 -1.06 0.910 49.0% +57 — — 61.9% +0.67 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.15
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1527 96.8 -2.43 +2.78 1.068 50.0% — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — +0.25
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1527 107.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.17
Career — 2241 165.8 +2.25 +1.56 1.084 51.3% -20 +139 -230 58.6% +0.47 105–65 (62%) 138–117 (54%) 106.3 -1.29 — 1849 131.9 -2.03 -0.86 0.881 47.9% -1 -137 +45 39.0% -0.67 33–31 (52%) 29–43 (40%) 97.8 +0.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.