H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Dusan Lajovic vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 1-5

Dominic Thiem holds a 5–1 lead over Dusan Lajovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Dominic Thiem leads 5–1 on clay. Most recently, Dusan Lajovic won the 2019 Monte-Carlo Masters third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dusan Lajovic
Serbia Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main-draw meetings
Dominic Thiem
AUT Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dusan Lajovic #48 6-3 6-3 Dominic Thiem #5 Match data Apr 19, 2019* R16 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Dominic Thiem #8 6-4 5-7 6-4 Dusan Lajovic #68 Match data May 26, 2018* SF Open 13 Provence ATP 250 Clay
Dominic Thiem #6 6-2 7-5 Dusan Lajovic #84 Match data Feb 22, 2018* R32 Rio Open ATP 500 Clay
Dominic Thiem #8 6-2 7-5 Dusan Lajovic #97 Match data Feb 24, 2017* R16 Rio Open ATP 500 Clay
Dominic Thiem #19 6-4 6-2 Dusan Lajovic #79 Match data Feb 13, 2016* QF Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay
Dominic Thiem #26 6-1 3-1 (ret.) Dusan Lajovic #119 Match data Jul 24, 2015* R16 Croatia Open Umag ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dusan Lajovic #167 #23 1,895 1,901 192 258 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,240 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dusan Lajovic Dominic Thiem
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #434 1,455 0 0 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,852 0 0
21 2011 2–5 28.6% #190 1,617 0 0 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,891 0 3
22 2012 1–1 50.0% #163 1,545 0 0 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,005 0 7
23 2013 0–4 0.0% #116 1,556 0 0 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8
24 2014 14–17 45.2% #69 1,682 0 0 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,066 0 11
25 2015 16–21 43.2% #76 1,794 0 0 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,143 0 16
26 2016 18–22 45.0% #93 1,750 0 0 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,201 1 17
27 2017 15–21 41.7% #75 1,717 0 0 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17
28 2018 23–23 50.0% #48 1,823 0 0 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17
29 2019 20–26 43.5% #34 1,703 0 1 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17
30 2020 10–14 41.7% #26 1,699 0 1 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,628 1 17
31 2021 17–25 40.5% #33 1,711 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2022 10–20 33.3% #80 1,656 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2023 23–22 51.1% #52 1,728 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2024 17–17 50.0% #81 1,695 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2025 4–13 23.5% #121 1,617 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2026 2–6 25.0% #167 1,602 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dusan Lajovic Dominic Thiem
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
20 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2011 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2015 14 16 30 46.7% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 25 15 40 62.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0%
23 2013 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2017 21 19 40 52.5% 22 5 27 81.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2018 23 11 34 67.6% 26 8 34 76.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 25 9 34 73.5% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2020 18 5 23 78.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
27 2017 8 11 19 42.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2021 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2018 8 9 17 47.1% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2022 11 7 18 61.1% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — —
29 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 2020 3 7 10 30.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2021 11 14 25 44.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 3 8 11 27.3% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 8 9 17 47.1% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 4 7 11 36.4% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 2 3 5 40.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 114 186 38.7% 114 124 238 47.9% 6 20 26 23.1% — 161 115 276 58.3% 161 74 235 68.5% 15 18 33 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 449/451 of Dusan Lajovic's and 539/544 of Dominic Thiem's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dusan Lajovic Dominic Thiem
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 4/4 4.0 2.8 48.1% 75.6% 37.4% 48.4% 86.1% 55.7% 33.4%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 5.0 3.0 61.3% 75.2% 45.6% 73.5% 38.9% 63.6% 28.9%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 6/6 5.8 2.5 54.7% 78.5% 62.7% 58.8% 39.6% 70.9% 38.3%
20 2010 1/1 4.0 2.0 56.9% 75.7% 57.1% 50.0% 33.3% 67.7% 25.0% 2014 44/45 4.4 2.9 57.3% 72.6% 50.7% 58.4% 41.6% 62.9% 37.1%
21 2011 7/7 2.3 2.1 63.6% 60.6% 43.8% 55.7% 36.1% 54.4% 38.8% 2015 62/62 5.9 2.3 56.6% 74.8% 56.2% 58.9% 35.8% 66.5% 37.1%
22 2012 2/2 2.0 1.5 54.7% 70.0% 49.7% 33.3% 64.3% 60.4% 37.2% 2016 80/82 5.9 2.9 61.4% 74.3% 54.1% 56.1% 40.5% 66.4% 37.4%
23 2013 4/4 2.8 3.5 56.8% 72.2% 38.3% 57.0% 37.5% 57.5% 32.8% 2017 74/74 6.1 3.1 58.8% 75.2% 52.6% 61.5% 41.3% 65.9% 38.5%
24 2014 31/31 5.4 2.5 59.8% 70.3% 51.4% 63.5% 37.0% 62.5% 34.8% 2018 70/71 7.3 3.5 58.8% 75.9% 53.3% 63.4% 39.3% 66.5% 38.4%
25 2015 37/37 3.6 1.8 63.1% 67.6% 53.5% 58.0% 39.8% 62.6% 36.7% 2019 64/65 4.8 2.1 65.8% 73.6% 56.2% 60.7% 45.4% 67.6% 38.0%
26 2016 40/40 4.2 2.0 66.8% 70.5% 54.0% 55.9% 33.8% 64.8% 33.4% 2020 31/31 7.1 2.8 63.4% 74.0% 53.5% 64.3% 43.8% 66.4% 38.0%
27 2017 36/36 3.4 1.4 68.7% 67.5% 55.1% 64.0% 49.2% 63.7% 33.9% 2021 16/16 4.6 2.6 63.9% 72.8% 54.3% 66.1% 46.9% 66.2% 36.4%
28 2018 46/46 3.8 1.6 64.5% 68.9% 53.7% 57.7% 41.8% 63.3% 36.7% 2022 34/34 4.3 2.2 63.3% 68.8% 52.8% 50.6% 35.6% 63.3% 36.5%
29 2019 46/46 3.4 1.7 68.8% 66.4% 50.9% 53.5% 44.4% 61.7% 36.4% 2023 41/41 5.4 2.9 60.8% 72.2% 52.2% 61.4% 33.1% 64.3% 34.1%
30 2020 24/24 4.4 2.2 66.5% 67.0% 51.1% 53.0% 35.6% 61.5% 37.0% 2024 10/10 5.9 3.3 58.0% 67.4% 53.0% 48.4% 38.6% 61.4% 27.8%
31 2021 42/42 3.3 1.9 66.9% 66.2% 51.2% 61.0% 38.3% 61.3% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 30/30 3.4 1.5 67.8% 65.4% 51.2% 54.4% 35.2% 61.0% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 45/45 2.8 1.4 68.1% 66.4% 47.2% 58.5% 42.3% 60.2% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 33/34 2.5 1.1 70.0% 68.6% 50.4% 59.2% 40.3% 63.2% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 17/17 3.8 1.3 66.2% 62.3% 47.6% 57.0% 31.4% 57.5% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 8/9 2.9 1.0 70.0% 64.8% 52.6% 49.3% 20.8% 61.3% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 449/451 3.6 1.7 66.4% 67.4% 51.4% 57.7% 39.5% 62.0% 35.8% — 539/544 5.7 2.8 60.4% 73.8% 53.6% 59.6% 40.4% 65.7% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dusan Lajovic Dominic Thiem
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1491 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1496 112.5 -2.63 -3.33 0.753 45.1% +32 — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.02
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1487 106.1 +0.37 -3.45 0.794 48.0% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — +0.16
19 2009 1488 107.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1580 124.6 +2.00 -0.38 1.319 54.2% -19 -9 — 64.3% +1.29 1–1 0–1 — +0.35
20 2010 1456 98.2 -4.10 +5.17 0.774 46.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.17 2014 1853 150.8 -0.10 +1.26 1.001 49.9% -30 -16 — 50.0% -0.09 8–8 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 104.7 -1.38
21 2011 1617 123.2 -3.15 -1.36 0.850 46.9% +71 — — 31.3% -1.31 1–1 — — -0.05 2015 1892 154.0 +1.96 +1.24 1.108 51.3% -65 +157 -301 51.8% +0.13 10–9 (53%) 17–24 (41%) 97.2 +0.34
22 2012 1546 105.7 -1.19 -1.40 0.941 47.7% — — — 100.0% +2.00 — — — +0.43 2016 2006 168.6 +3.18 +1.63 1.114 51.5% -61 +166 -227 63.5% +0.71 21–3 (88%) 20–14 (59%) 118.6 -0.64
23 2013 1557 106.0 -2.06 -2.92 0.772 44.9% — +68 — 11.1% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.53 2017 1959 167.8 +2.96 +2.51 1.131 52.0% -82 +337 -151 63.7% +0.80 7–12 (37%) 14–14 (50%) 93.6 +0.76
24 2014 1683 134.5 -1.16 -1.70 0.927 48.8% -55 +84 -152 44.2% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) 102.7 +0.93 2018 2067 169.1 +3.22 +2.98 1.147 52.2% -45 +195 -279 66.7% +0.99 14–5 (74%) 17–14 (55%) 103.1 +0.03
25 2015 1794 140.2 -1.72 +1.10 0.980 49.7% -92 +37 — 45.9% -0.21 5–7 (42%) 4–6 (40%) 97.1 +0.09 2019 2144 172.9 +3.94 +3.40 1.174 52.5% -34 +136 — 65.6% +0.78 14–3 (82%) 16–12 (57%) 111.2 -1.32
26 2016 1751 141.6 +0.22 -1.41 0.950 49.1% -14 +31 — 47.2% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 8–8 (50%) 104.1 -1.07 2020 2202 171.1 +4.24 +2.58 1.132 52.4% +10 +19 — 69.1% +1.14 7–3 (70%) 15–9 (63%) 102.9 -2.09
27 2017 1718 142.2 -0.25 -1.56 0.934 49.2% +16 -35 -179 43.2% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 3–16 (16%) 96.2 -0.10 2021 2015 141.5 +1.76 +0.56 1.075 51.5% +142 +122 — 52.3% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 97.8 +0.26
28 2018 1823 155.7 -0.39 +1.43 0.999 50.0% -42 +51 -266 51.6% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 8–9 (47%) 98.0 -3.08 2022 1908 145.5 +0.24 +0.10 0.994 49.8% +149 +46 — 47.6% -0.26 10–5 (67%) 14–4 (78%) 103.9 -2.20
29 2019 1704 144.6 -2.23 +0.58 0.950 49.4% -32 +176 — 45.2% -0.20 7–8 (47%) 5–10 (33%) 94.5 +1.50 2023 1800 137.0 -0.18 -1.41 0.957 49.4% +72 +55 — 47.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 10–10 (50%) 96.8 -1.03
30 2020 1699 143.8 -0.71 +0.76 0.961 49.4% -50 +150 — 43.5% -0.32 3–2 (60%) 6–9 (40%) 99.3 +0.28 2024 1628 110.1 -2.09 -4.22 0.720 45.2% +169 +71 — 19.2% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.8 -0.23
31 2021 1712 145.2 -1.16 -0.58 0.932 48.9% +12 +43 -189 43.2% -0.27 4–7 (36%) 4–9 (31%) 94.1 +1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1657 130.4 -1.81 -1.46 0.892 47.9% -22 +79 -127 38.2% -0.66 5–9 (36%) 6–8 (43%) 95.3 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1728 147.4 -2.69 +1.08 0.924 48.5% -28 +34 — 50.5% -0.10 8–5 (62%) 10–8 (56%) 105.3 -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1695 141.8 -0.34 +0.45 0.997 50.0% -61 +104 — 47.8% +0.02 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.3 -1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1618 123.1 -3.96 -0.07 0.882 47.5% -53 +122 — 25.6% -1.26 0–1 1–1 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1602 116.0 -1.23 -0.21 0.842 46.9% — +64 — 31.6% -1.32 0–2 2–0 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1901 144.6 -1.31 -0.09 0.941 49.0% -25 +71 -181 44.5% -0.29 65–75 (46%) 71–98 (42%) 95.2 -0.51 — 2241 165.8 +2.25 +1.56 1.084 51.3% -20 +139 -230 58.6% +0.47 105–65 (62%) 138–117 (54%) 106.3 -1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.