H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Dusan Lajovic vs Egor Gerasimov H2H: 0-1

Egor Gerasimov holds a 1–0 lead over Dusan Lajovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Egor Gerasimov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Egor Gerasimov won the 2020 US Open first round 6-1 4-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dusan Lajovic
Serbia Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Egor Gerasimov
Belarus Age 33 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Egor Gerasimov #72 6-1 4-6 6-4 6-4 Dusan Lajovic #24 Match data Sep 2, 2020* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dusan Lajovic #167 #23 1,895 1,901 192 258 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Egor Gerasimov #780 #65 950 1,818 45 53 45.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dusan Lajovic Egor Gerasimov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #434 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2011 2–5 28.6% #190 1,617 0 0 2014 0–1 0.0% #268 1,461 0 0
22 2012 1–1 50.0% #163 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2013 0–4 0.0% #116 1,556 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2014 14–17 45.2% #69 1,682 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2015 16–21 43.2% #76 1,794 0 0 2018 4–2 66.7% #157 1,589 0 0
26 2016 18–22 45.0% #93 1,750 0 0 2019 8–7 53.3% #98 1,744 0 0
27 2017 15–21 41.7% #75 1,717 0 0 2020 12–9 57.1% #78 1,755 0 0
28 2018 23–23 50.0% #48 1,823 0 0 2021 16–24 40.0% #113 1,663 0 0
29 2019 20–26 43.5% #34 1,703 0 1 2022 4–8 33.3% #278 1,713 0 0
30 2020 10–14 41.7% #26 1,699 0 1 2023 1–1 50.0% #366 1,616 0 0
31 2021 17–25 40.5% #33 1,711 0 1 2024 0–1 0.0% #331 1,613 0 0
32 2022 10–20 33.3% #80 1,656 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2023 23–22 51.1% #52 1,728 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2024 17–17 50.0% #81 1,695 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2025 4–13 23.5% #121 1,617 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2026 2–6 25.0% #167 1,602 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dusan Lajovic Egor Gerasimov
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
26 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2019 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2017 8 11 19 42.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2020 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2018 8 9 17 47.1% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2021 12 17 29 41.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2022 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2020 3 7 10 30.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2021 11 14 25 44.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2022 3 8 11 27.3% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 8 9 17 47.1% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 4 7 11 36.4% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 2 3 5 40.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 114 186 38.7% 114 124 238 47.9% 6 20 26 23.1% — 39 42 81 48.1% 4 9 13 30.8% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 449/451 of Dusan Lajovic's and 96/98 of Egor Gerasimov's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dusan Lajovic Egor Gerasimov
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2010 1/1 4.0 2.0 56.9% 75.7% 57.1% 50.0% 33.3% 67.7% 25.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 7/7 2.3 2.1 63.6% 60.6% 43.8% 55.7% 36.1% 54.4% 38.8% 2014 1/1 7.0 4.0 54.0% 82.4% 34.5% 50.0% 0.0% 60.3% 16.4%
22 2012 2/2 2.0 1.5 54.7% 70.0% 49.7% 33.3% 64.3% 60.4% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 4/4 2.8 3.5 56.8% 72.2% 38.3% 57.0% 37.5% 57.5% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2014 31/31 5.4 2.5 59.8% 70.3% 51.4% 63.5% 37.0% 62.5% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 37/37 3.6 1.8 63.1% 67.6% 53.5% 58.0% 39.8% 62.6% 36.7% 2018 6/6 9.7 3.3 63.0% 70.3% 54.4% 62.8% 39.8% 64.4% 34.8%
26 2016 40/40 4.2 2.0 66.8% 70.5% 54.0% 55.9% 33.8% 64.8% 33.4% 2019 15/15 8.7 2.5 67.3% 72.4% 53.0% 62.9% 27.9% 66.1% 35.4%
27 2017 36/36 3.4 1.4 68.7% 67.5% 55.1% 64.0% 49.2% 63.7% 33.9% 2020 21/21 9.7 3.6 64.1% 74.9% 52.5% 58.7% 47.7% 66.9% 34.8%
28 2018 46/46 3.8 1.6 64.5% 68.9% 53.7% 57.7% 41.8% 63.3% 36.7% 2021 38/40 6.3 4.2 63.9% 69.3% 43.8% 59.0% 35.4% 60.1% 36.1%
29 2019 46/46 3.4 1.7 68.8% 66.4% 50.9% 53.5% 44.4% 61.7% 36.4% 2022 12/12 5.3 3.0 65.0% 69.7% 47.3% 49.2% 33.3% 61.5% 34.8%
30 2020 24/24 4.4 2.2 66.5% 67.0% 51.1% 53.0% 35.6% 61.5% 37.0% 2023 2/2 4.5 1.0 61.2% 74.0% 42.9% 16.7% 25.0% 61.9% 33.9%
31 2021 42/42 3.3 1.9 66.9% 66.2% 51.2% 61.0% 38.3% 61.3% 36.1% 2024 1/1 10.0 1.0 65.3% 71.2% 57.1% 66.7% — 66.3% 21.2%
32 2022 30/30 3.4 1.5 67.8% 65.4% 51.2% 54.4% 35.2% 61.0% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 45/45 2.8 1.4 68.1% 66.4% 47.2% 58.5% 42.3% 60.2% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 33/34 2.5 1.1 70.0% 68.6% 50.4% 59.2% 40.3% 63.2% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 17/17 3.8 1.3 66.2% 62.3% 47.6% 57.0% 31.4% 57.5% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 8/9 2.9 1.0 70.0% 64.8% 52.6% 49.3% 20.8% 61.3% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 449/451 3.6 1.7 66.4% 67.4% 51.4% 57.7% 39.5% 62.0% 35.8% — 96/98 7.5 3.5 64.4% 71.4% 48.3% 57.7% 36.0% 63.1% 35.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dusan Lajovic Egor Gerasimov
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2009 1488 107.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1483 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1456 98.2 -4.10 +5.17 0.774 46.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.17 2013 1499 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 1617 123.2 -3.15 -1.36 0.850 46.9% +71 — — 31.3% -1.31 1–1 — — -0.05 2014 1461 96.4 -3.15 -2.04 0.412 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.11
22 2012 1546 105.7 -1.19 -1.40 0.941 47.7% — — — 100.0% +2.00 — — — +0.43 2015 1474 107.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 1557 106.0 -2.06 -2.92 0.772 44.9% — +68 — 11.1% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.53 2016 1453 101.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2014 1683 134.5 -1.16 -1.70 0.927 48.8% -55 +84 -152 44.2% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.93 2017 1435 98.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 1794 140.2 -1.72 +1.10 0.980 49.7% -92 +37 — 45.9% -0.21 5–7 (42%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.09 2018 1589 125.8 +0.94 -0.25 0.977 49.9% +48 — — 57.1% +0.29 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.16
26 2016 1751 141.6 +0.22 -1.41 0.950 49.1% -14 +31 — 47.2% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.07 2019 1745 130.0 +1.10 +0.62 1.043 50.3% +28 — — 54.1% -0.19 2–3 (40%) 9–2 (82%) — -0.40
27 2017 1718 142.2 -0.25 -1.56 0.934 49.2% +16 -35 -179 43.2% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 3–16 (16%) — -0.10 2020 1755 137.7 +2.44 -0.83 1.051 50.9% +35 — — 50.8% +0.15 6–3 (67%) 7–7 (50%) — +0.52
28 2018 1823 155.7 -0.39 +1.43 0.999 50.0% -42 +51 -266 51.6% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 8–9 (47%) — -3.08 2021 1663 140.0 -2.34 -0.61 0.904 48.6% +63 -232 -113 39.6% -0.48 6–4 (60%) 6–12 (33%) — -1.68
29 2019 1704 144.6 -2.23 +0.58 0.950 49.4% -32 +176 — 45.2% -0.20 7–8 (47%) 5–10 (33%) — +1.50 2022 1713 134.1 -1.25 +0.19 0.905 48.4% -29 -150 — 37.5% -0.69 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -1.59
30 2020 1699 143.8 -0.71 +0.76 0.961 49.4% -50 +150 — 43.5% -0.32 3–2 (60%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.28 2023 1617 98.1 -0.07 -3.38 0.890 47.8% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 1–1 — -0.09
31 2021 1712 145.2 -1.16 -0.58 0.932 48.9% +12 +43 -189 43.2% -0.27 4–7 (36%) 4–9 (31%) — +1.15 2024 1613 101.5 -2.42 -5.27 0.629 45.7% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.13
32 2022 1657 130.4 -1.81 -1.46 0.892 47.9% -22 +79 -127 38.2% -0.66 5–9 (36%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1728 147.4 -2.69 +1.08 0.924 48.5% -28 +34 — 50.5% -0.10 8–5 (62%) 10–8 (56%) — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1695 141.8 -0.34 +0.45 0.997 50.0% -61 +104 — 47.8% +0.02 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) — -1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1618 123.1 -3.96 -0.07 0.882 47.5% -53 +122 — 25.6% -1.26 0–1 1–1 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1602 116.0 -1.24 -0.10 0.842 46.9% — +64 — 31.6% -1.32 0–2 2–0 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1901 144.6 -1.31 -0.09 0.941 49.0% -25 +71 -181 44.5% -0.29 65–75 (46%) 71–98 (42%) 95.2 -0.51 — 1819 132.7 -0.38 -0.46 0.949 49.3% +39 -202 -113 44.9% -0.30 19–14 (58%) 26–27 (49%) 104.0 -3.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.