H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Dusan Lajovic vs Mischa Zverev H2H: 1-0
Dusan Lajovic holds a 1–0 lead over Mischa Zverev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dusan Lajovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dusan Lajovic won the 2016 Kitzbuhel fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2016* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Dusan Lajovic | 6-4 6-4 | Mischa Zverev | Match data |
| Jun 21, 2015 | Nottingham | ATP 250 | Q1 | Grass | Mischa Zverev | 6-2 7-6(2) | Dusan Lajovic | Match data |
| Oct 24, 2011 | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | Q1 | Hard | Dusan Lajovic | 7-5 6-2 | Mischa Zverev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dusan Lajovic | #152 | #23 | 1,895 | 1,900 | 192 | 257 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mischa Zverev | #1,373 | #25 | 1,664 | 2,007 | 134 | 199 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dusan Lajovic | Mischa Zverev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #80 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #190 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–18 | 10.0% | #211 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #76 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #176 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #93 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #75 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #171 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #51 | 1,917 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #34 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #33 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #26 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2021 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #33 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2022 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2023 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #52 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #81 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #121 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |