H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Dusan Lajovic vs Zhizhen Zhang H2H: 0-2
Zhizhen Zhang holds a 2–0 lead over Dusan Lajovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Zhizhen Zhang leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Zhizhen Zhang won the 2023 Kitzbuhel third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
China
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2023* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Zhizhen Zhang | 6-3 6-2 | Dusan Lajovic | Match data |
| May 30, 2023* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Zhizhen Zhang | 6-1 4-1 (ret.) | Dusan Lajovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dusan Lajovic | #152 | #23 | 1,895 | 1,900 | 192 | 257 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Zhizhen Zhang | #156 | #31 | 1,351 | 1,842 | 57 | 74 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Dusan Lajovic | Zhizhen Zhang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #413 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #190 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #360 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #76 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #99 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #93 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #75 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #45 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #410 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #34 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #26 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #33 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #52 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #81 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #121 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |