H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Dustin Brown vs Izak Van der Merwe H2H: 0-1
Izak Van der Merwe holds a 1–0 lead over Dustin Brown in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Izak Van der Merwe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Izak Van der Merwe won the 2011 Johannesburg fourth round 4-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JAM
Age 41
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 42
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2011* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Izak Van der Merwe | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | Dustin Brown | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dustin Brown | #1,058 | #64 | 778 | 1,903 | 61 | 96 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Izak Van der Merwe | #1,965 | #113 | 507 | 1,583 | 7 | 7 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dustin Brown | Izak Van der Merwe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #304 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #92 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #272 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #167 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #113 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #214 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #118 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #72 | 1,868 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #203 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |