H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Egor Gerasimov vs Nikola Milojevic H2H: 1-0
Egor Gerasimov holds a 1–0 lead over Nikola Milojevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Egor Gerasimov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Egor Gerasimov won the 2020 Pune fourth round 2-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Belarus
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q1 | Clay | Egor Gerasimov | 7-5 2-6 6-2 | Nikola Milojevic | Match data |
| Feb 7, 2020* | Pune | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Egor Gerasimov | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Nikola Milojevic | Match data |
| May 26, 2019* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q1 | Clay | Nikola Milojevic | 7-5 6-3 | Egor Gerasimov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egor Gerasimov | #780 | #65 | 950 | 1,817 | 44 | 52 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nikola Milojevic | #1,425 | #125 | 582 | 1,650 | 5 | 7 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Egor Gerasimov | Nikola Milojevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #157 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #98 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #78 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #231 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #113 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #366 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |