H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:15 UTC
Egor Gerasimov vs Pablo Cuevas
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Egor Gerasimov vs Pablo Cuevas.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Belarus
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
URU
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egor Gerasimov | #780 | #65 | 950 | 1,817 | 44 | 52 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pablo Cuevas | #841 | #19 | 1,865 | 1,960 | 211 | 212 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Egor Gerasimov | Pablo Cuevas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #50 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #157 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #142 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #98 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #78 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #113 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2022 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #40 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #366 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #32 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #97 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #269 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 |