H2H data updated: 2026-07-16 13:16 UTC
Emilio Nava vs John Millman H2H: 1-0
Emilio Nava holds a 1–0 lead over John Millman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emilio Nava leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emilio Nava won the 2022 US Open first round 7-6(7) 4-6 7-6(4) 1-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 24
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2022* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Emilio Nava | 7-6(7) 4-6 7-6(4) 1-6 6-1 | John Millman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Nava | #91 | #74 | 753 | 1,715 | 14 | 33 | 29.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| John Millman | #1,164 | #33 | 1,530 | 1,899 | 113 | 143 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilio Nava | John Millman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #944 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #323 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #212 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #541 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #91 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #92 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #128 | 1,819 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #48 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #72 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #147 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #483 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |