H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Emilio Nava vs Marco Trungelliti
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Emilio Nava vs Marco Trungelliti.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 24
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
Argentina
Age 36
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Nava | #91 | #74 | 753 | 1,715 | 14 | 33 | 29.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marco Trungelliti | #99 | #76 | 758 | 1,712 | 23 | 34 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilio Nava | Marco Trungelliti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #944 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #323 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #212 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #200 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #275 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #91 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #123 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |