H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Eric Quigley vs Adrian Menendez Maceiras

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Eric Quigley vs Adrian Menendez Maceiras.

USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 0
0 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Adrian Menendez Maceiras 7-6(11) 6-3 Eric Quigley #463 Match data Feb 9, 2015 Q1 Q Memphis ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eric Quigley #1,327 #297 167 1,570 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Adrian Menendez Maceiras 1,644 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Eric Quigley Adrian Menendez Maceiras
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
2015 0–1 0.0% #314 1,548 0 0

Performance Progression by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Eric Quigley Adrian Menendez Maceiras
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
2015 1/1 6.0 3.0 55.9% 72.7% 57.7% 50.0% 0.0% 66.1% 22.8% 2012 1/1 2.0 5.0 57.6% 61.4% 45.2% 50.0% 20.0% 54.5% 27.3%
—/— 2013 2/2 6.0 2.5 62.0% 54.0% 41.9% 54.2% 25.0% 49.3% 25.7%
—/— 2015 5/5 6.0 3.2 58.6% 68.8% 51.3% 57.4% 54.9% 61.5% 30.9%
—/— 2017 6/6 5.0 1.7 61.5% 69.1% 47.8% 48.6% 38.5% 61.8% 33.5%
—/— 2018 6/6 3.7 2.0 63.8% 65.7% 46.2% 56.4% 40.0% 58.1% 33.1%
—/— 2019 4/4 4.0 2.8 58.7% 62.7% 45.2% 43.3% 45.9% 55.4% 32.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Eric Quigley Adrian Menendez Maceiras
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
2010 1491 102.5 2007 1472 97.1
2012 1500 104.5 2008 1448 96.8
2013 1494 104.1 2009 1427 100.5
2014 1502 101.3 2010 1407 101.3
2015 1549 111.6 +1.42 -1.40 0.673 44.8% 0.0% -2.00 -0.01 2011 1425 100.6
2016 1525 98.4 2012 1499 98.1 -0.33 -2.29 0.600 41.7% 0.0% -3.00 0–1 -0.01
2013 1574 109.6 -2.38 -2.31 0.508 38.5% 16.7% -3.17 1–1 -0.10
2014 1563 107.0
2015 1610 113.9 -2.56 -4.46 0.803 46.7% -2 35.7% -1.07 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) +0.22
2016 1588 109.4
2017 1607 112.5 -1.85 -1.76 0.877 47.9% +51 43.8% -0.69 0–2 3–2 (60%) +0.66
2018 1604 116.5 -2.99 -1.63 0.789 46.5% +59 40.0% -1.33 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.09
2019 1598 111.3 -3.29 -1.62 0.729 44.2% 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 +0.06
2020 1584 101.2
2021 1558 98.1
Career 1570 109.0 +1.42 -1.40 0.673 44.8% 0.0% -2.00 -1.00 Career 1645 111.3 -2.50 -2.33 0.764 45.6% +38 34.4% -1.33 3–8 (27%) 9–7 (56%) 98.7 +3.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.