H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Evgeny Donskoy vs Matthew Ebden H2H: 0-1

Matthew Ebden holds a 1–0 lead over Evgeny Donskoy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Matthew Ebden leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Matthew Ebden won the 2018 Chengdu Open first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Evgeny Donskoy
RUS Age 36 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Matthew Ebden
AUS Age 38 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Evgeny Donskoy #154 6-4 6-4 Matthew Ebden #248 Match data Jul 26, 2021 Q2 Q Atlanta ATP 250 Hard
Matthew Ebden #47 6-3 6-4 Evgeny Donskoy #85 Match data Sep 27, 2018* R32 Chengdu Open ATP 250 Hard
Evgeny Donskoy #125 7-6(3) 4-6 6-2 Matthew Ebden #696 Match data Jan 17, 2017* Q2 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Evgeny Donskoy #1,380 #65 764 1,793 52 113 31.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Matthew Ebden #970 #39 1,134 1,849 75 129 36.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Evgeny Donskoy Matthew Ebden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2008 0–1 0.0% #514 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 0–1 0.0% #472 1,473 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2010 1–2 33.3% #259 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2011 0–2 0.0% #144 1,552 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2012 0–4 0.0% #81 1,482 0 0 2010 1–2 33.3% #196 1,526 0 0
23 2013 12–19 38.7% #113 1,654 0 0 2011 10–10 50.0% #86 1,762 0 0
24 2014 3–9 25.0% #130 1,546 0 0 2012 15–23 39.5% #105 1,644 0 0
25 2015 5–5 50.0% #91 1,720 0 0 2013 4–11 26.7% #68 1,634 0 0
26 2016 7–19 26.9% #125 1,653 0 0 2014 5–21 19.2% #231 1,539 0 0
27 2017 5–14 26.3% #72 1,623 0 0 2015 1–6 14.3% #105 1,631 0 0
28 2018 14–21 40.0% #97 1,641 0 0 2016 0–4 0.0% #698 1,573 0 0
29 2019 3–6 33.3% #112 1,618 0 0 2017 9–7 56.2% #76 1,739 0 0
30 2020 1–4 20.0% #123 1,540 0 0 2018 19–22 46.3% #46 1,790 0 0
31 2021 1–6 14.3% #172 1,573 0 0 2019 5–16 23.8% #244 1,654 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2021 6–5 54.5% #237 1,591 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #740 1,527 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2024 0–1 0.0% — 1,526 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Evgeny Donskoy Matthew Ebden
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2013 9 13 22 40.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2011 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
24 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 14 16 30 46.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
25 2015 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2016 4 11 15 26.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 4 12 16 25.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2015 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2018 10 15 25 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2016 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2019 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2017 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 2020 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 12 16 28 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
31 2021 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 42 78 120 35.0% 6 23 29 20.7% 4 12 16 25.0% — 55 89 144 38.2% 1 14 15 6.7% 19 26 45 42.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 162/165 of Evgeny Donskoy's and 203/203 of Matthew Ebden's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Evgeny Donskoy Matthew Ebden
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2008 1/1 1.0 1.0 54.2% 61.5% 45.5% 33.3% — 54.2% 20.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1/1 6.0 1.0 42.0% 81.0% 51.7% 57.1% 0.0% 64.0% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 3/3 6.3 3.0 54.5% 67.1% 48.9% 65.2% 73.9% 58.9% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 2/2 4.0 2.5 60.9% 72.9% 43.0% 31.3% 14.3% 60.3% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 4/4 4.0 1.0 60.0% 64.9% 55.3% 52.5% 24.6% 61.1% 30.3% 2010 3/3 6.3 1.0 66.7% 72.6% 58.1% 64.3% 61.7% 67.6% 31.2%
23 2013 31/31 5.8 2.5 57.3% 72.2% 49.2% 63.9% 37.8% 62.4% 33.9% 2011 20/20 5.8 2.7 61.6% 72.0% 47.9% 47.2% 36.9% 63.0% 35.9%
24 2014 12/12 5.7 2.1 59.7% 70.7% 52.6% 57.9% 33.0% 63.3% 33.6% 2012 38/38 5.4 4.1 62.3% 68.9% 44.8% 52.5% 33.0% 59.8% 34.5%
25 2015 10/10 5.1 3.2 58.1% 73.3% 49.4% 61.9% 34.4% 63.4% 36.0% 2013 15/15 5.6 5.7 56.5% 73.1% 45.0% 50.4% 30.9% 61.0% 34.2%
26 2016 23/26 5.0 2.2 58.4% 67.7% 50.2% 55.6% 36.7% 60.5% 32.8% 2014 26/26 4.4 6.2 57.7% 68.5% 39.2% 44.0% 37.7% 55.6% 32.2%
27 2017 19/19 5.5 2.6 57.5% 71.6% 49.6% 54.2% 26.9% 62.5% 31.9% 2015 7/7 7.1 5.0 58.8% 71.7% 51.1% 63.2% 44.0% 62.9% 32.2%
28 2018 35/35 3.6 1.9 60.9% 66.0% 50.9% 62.7% 37.0% 60.3% 34.0% 2016 4/4 2.8 3.8 53.6% 51.5% 39.7% 44.0% 45.5% 46.2% 25.6%
29 2019 9/9 6.7 2.2 59.9% 73.9% 43.2% 60.5% 56.7% 61.6% 31.1% 2017 16/16 4.7 4.4 64.7% 71.6% 47.8% 54.0% 39.3% 63.1% 38.2%
30 2020 5/5 3.0 4.2 56.7% 68.8% 40.7% 48.5% 35.8% 56.7% 30.5% 2018 41/41 7.5 5.3 59.7% 72.5% 50.1% 59.9% 42.6% 63.3% 35.2%
31 2021 7/7 5.3 3.0 55.6% 70.7% 47.0% 53.3% 32.2% 60.2% 28.6% 2019 21/21 7.0 6.0 59.8% 71.7% 42.0% 54.0% 46.1% 59.9% 35.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 11/11 4.3 3.3 62.6% 71.7% 48.9% 64.3% 49.0% 62.5% 34.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 1/1 5.0 3.0 69.2% 83.3% 54.2% 0.0% 50.0% 74.4% 27.4%
Career — 162/165 5.0 2.4 58.5% 69.8% 49.4% 58.7% 36.0% 61.3% 33.0% — 203/204 5.8 4.7 60.4% 70.7% 46.0% 53.2% 39.6% 60.8% 34.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Evgeny Donskoy Matthew Ebden
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2007 1483 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1469 105.0 -0.44 -0.12 0.436 38.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1474 100.3 -1.05 -1.78 0.794 45.3% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.02 2007 1500 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1513 111.3 +0.09 -0.08 0.938 49.0% — — — 50.0% -0.62 0–2 1–1 — +0.24 2008 1486 97.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 1552 116.9 -0.88 -2.23 0.722 45.6% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.11 2009 1490 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 1483 102.2 -1.07 -2.34 0.779 45.7% — — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 — — +0.09 2010 1526 117.9 +1.93 +0.66 0.965 49.8% +20 — — 28.6% -0.57 — — — -0.49
23 2013 1654 136.6 -0.81 -1.65 0.902 48.2% +1 -165 -44 43.7% -0.49 4–7 (36%) 6–11 (35%) — -0.05 2011 1762 127.8 +1.26 -1.35 0.971 49.6% -32 — -47 44.4% -0.42 4–1 (80%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.59
24 2014 1546 122.5 -0.84 -1.27 0.914 48.1% +56 — — 37.5% -0.84 0–5 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.54 2012 1645 128.5 -2.57 -1.66 0.858 47.3% +15 -179 +28 39.8% -0.69 9–5 (64%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.07
25 2015 1721 129.8 -0.73 +0.60 0.984 50.0% +8 — — 52.0% 0.00 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.04 2013 1635 122.7 -1.51 -1.64 0.876 47.9% +18 — — 31.6% -1.24 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.71
26 2016 1653 128.2 -1.90 -3.06 0.831 46.7% -12 -76 -87 35.8% -0.96 2–8 (20%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.44 2014 1540 122.0 -6.43 -2.74 0.726 44.3% +30 -112 +36 26.2% -1.63 3–4 (43%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.48
27 2017 1624 132.0 -0.67 -3.10 0.850 46.8% +89 -116 — 25.0% -1.45 2–3 (40%) 3–8 (27%) — +0.25 2015 1631 122.0 -2.35 -0.31 0.869 48.1% -24 — +48 30.0% -0.35 0–3 (0%) 0–6 (0%) — +0.22
28 2018 1642 136.4 -2.46 -2.27 0.857 47.6% -9 -50 -129 40.2% -0.85 3–3 (50%) 7–2 (78%) — -1.64 2016 1573 113.0 -4.76 -3.67 0.476 37.3% -25 — — 12.5% -3.13 — — — +0.28
29 2019 1618 122.8 -1.17 -2.19 0.810 47.4% +6 — — 30.4% -0.65 1–0 2–4 (33%) — +0.32 2017 1739 127.4 -1.27 +2.03 1.034 50.6% -69 — +46 50.0% +0.21 5–1 (83%) 2–5 (29%) — +1.33
30 2020 1540 109.2 -2.48 -1.01 0.704 43.9% +38 — — 23.1% -2.16 0–1 1–0 — +0.09 2018 1791 148.3 -0.68 +0.04 0.958 49.3% -42 — +64 47.1% -0.21 6–6 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.04
31 2021 1573 116.3 -1.71 -1.82 0.719 45.4% +29 — — 23.5% -0.94 0–1 0–4 (0%) — -0.06 2019 1654 126.9 -3.44 +0.06 0.888 47.9% +33 — +98 33.3% -0.87 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.35
32 2022 1526 94.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1631 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1470 92.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1592 115.4 +0.31 -1.06 0.910 49.0% +57 — — 61.9% +0.67 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.15
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1527 96.8 -2.43 +2.78 1.068 50.0% — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — +0.25
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1527 107.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.17
Career — 1794 130.1 -1.40 -1.99 0.853 47.4% +16 -96 -87 36.5% -0.89 12–35 (26%) 29–42 (41%) 90.7 -0.49 — 1849 131.9 -2.03 -0.86 0.881 47.9% -1 -137 +45 39.0% -0.67 33–31 (52%) 29–43 (40%) 97.8 +0.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.