H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Facundo Bagnis vs Martin Klizan H2H: 1-0

Facundo Bagnis holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Klizan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Facundo Bagnis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Facundo Bagnis won the 2019 Croatia Open Umag first round 4-6 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Facundo Bagnis
Argentina Age 36 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Martin Klizan
Slovakia Age 37 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Facundo Bagnis #152 4-6 6-3 7-5 Martin Klizan #61 Match data Jul 18, 2019* R32 Croatia Open Umag ATP 250 Clay
Martin Klizan #112 4-6 6-4 7-6(0) Facundo Bagnis #149 Match data Jul 30, 2018 Q1 Q Austrian Open Kitzbühel ATP 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Facundo Bagnis #500 #55 985 1,759 45 88 33.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Martin Klizan #831 #24 1,445 1,979 128 147 46.5% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Facundo Bagnis Martin Klizan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2007 1–1 50.0% #395 1,524 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #234 1,542 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2010 1–2 33.3% #155 1,607 0 0
21 2011 0–2 0.0% #157 1,499 0 0 2011 0–2 0.0% #117 1,600 0 0
22 2012 1–2 33.3% #237 1,517 0 0 2012 16–14 53.3% #30 1,792 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 2013 12–24 33.3% #108 1,690 0 1
24 2014 2–3 40.0% #125 1,607 0 0 2014 23–16 59.0% #34 1,930 0 2
25 2015 2–4 33.3% #140 1,562 0 0 2015 24–27 47.1% #43 1,797 0 3
26 2016 6–11 35.3% #56 1,640 0 0 2016 14–15 48.3% #35 1,752 0 5
27 2017 3–12 20.0% #181 1,593 0 0 2017 10–15 40.0% #141 1,757 0 5
28 2018 2–4 33.3% #153 1,633 0 0 2018 18–9 66.7% #41 1,917 0 6
29 2019 2–5 28.6% #137 1,629 0 0 2019 9–18 33.3% #141 1,701 0 6
30 2020 1–4 20.0% #125 1,673 0 0 2020 0–2 0.0% #151 1,648 0 6
31 2021 11–12 47.8% #76 1,668 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2022 7–15 31.8% #89 1,643 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2023 2–9 18.2% #242 1,636 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2024 5–3 62.5% #144 1,648 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2025 1–2 33.3% #398 1,601 0 0 2025 0–1 0.0% #835 1,555 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Facundo Bagnis Martin Klizan
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2011 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2012 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 10 6 16 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 4 13 17 23.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2014 8 8 16 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 2015 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 12 14 26 46.2% 12 11 23 52.2% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2018 6 5 11 54.5% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — —
29 2019 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2019 4 9 13 30.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2020 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 3 7 10 30.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1 2 3 33.3% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 8 22 30 26.7% 37 61 98 37.8% 0 5 5 0.0% — 58 79 137 42.3% 66 55 121 54.5% 4 13 17 23.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 132/133 of Facundo Bagnis's and 271/275 of Martin Klizan's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Facundo Bagnis Martin Klizan
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 4.5 5.0 50.7% 64.2% 50.8% 61.7% 45.0% 58.5% 41.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 2.0 3.0 44.4% 64.3% 37.1% 44.4% 30.0% 49.2% 43.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 3/3 4.7 7.3 48.1% 67.9% 41.9% 64.6% 41.1% 54.6% 35.4%
21 2011 2/2 2.0 7.0 48.1% 68.3% 47.2% 47.9% 30.0% 57.2% 34.7% 2011 2/2 1.5 5.5 60.6% 52.6% 35.0% 22.7% 29.2% 45.7% 35.2%
22 2012 3/3 4.0 2.0 64.7% 69.3% 51.5% 54.5% 22.9% 63.0% 33.4% 2012 29/30 3.9 3.5 56.1% 71.1% 50.5% 56.3% 48.2% 62.1% 41.4%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 36/36 6.0 3.9 54.7% 67.3% 48.8% 60.3% 40.6% 58.8% 36.4%
24 2014 5/5 5.8 5.0 61.3% 68.0% 46.6% 55.7% 37.6% 59.5% 30.9% 2014 36/39 5.7 3.2 56.9% 73.3% 52.4% 61.3% 44.3% 63.9% 37.9%
25 2015 6/6 3.3 2.7 59.7% 60.4% 49.9% 54.0% 38.5% 55.8% 33.6% 2015 51/51 4.8 3.6 57.5% 68.9% 48.4% 56.2% 42.0% 60.3% 34.4%
26 2016 17/17 3.1 4.2 59.5% 66.0% 48.1% 51.3% 39.0% 58.1% 36.2% 2016 29/29 4.6 4.4 58.0% 69.6% 49.4% 58.1% 49.6% 60.7% 38.5%
27 2017 15/15 5.9 4.3 61.7% 68.1% 45.2% 54.6% 34.5% 59.3% 32.0% 2017 25/25 3.3 3.3 64.7% 67.0% 50.6% 58.0% 40.2% 61.2% 36.6%
28 2018 6/6 5.2 4.0 63.8% 70.7% 55.0% 56.1% 27.1% 64.8% 34.3% 2018 27/27 4.5 2.4 62.1% 70.2% 55.5% 59.1% 54.5% 64.5% 37.8%
29 2019 7/7 3.0 2.1 59.1% 62.4% 51.3% 54.4% 37.8% 58.0% 32.1% 2019 27/27 4.3 4.5 58.1% 67.0% 47.9% 55.1% 48.2% 58.9% 35.1%
30 2020 5/5 4.8 2.4 60.4% 64.5% 55.4% 39.8% 26.2% 60.7% 37.6% 2020 2/2 5.0 1.5 55.6% 68.0% 47.9% 51.4% 32.5% 59.0% 34.8%
31 2021 22/23 5.5 2.9 60.5% 69.6% 49.5% 63.3% 43.3% 61.8% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 22/22 5.5 2.3 62.4% 66.9% 50.7% 57.5% 41.8% 60.8% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 11/11 6.1 2.7 66.3% 61.8% 47.4% 54.7% 35.9% 57.1% 30.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 8/8 3.8 1.9 64.3% 67.7% 51.7% 70.7% 45.4% 62.0% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 3/3 6.0 1.3 63.7% 68.7% 54.3% 62.7% 43.7% 63.7% 37.3% 2025 1/1 0.0 4.0 64.0% 72.0% 42.0% 56.0% 60.0% 62.0% 29.0%
Career — 132/133 4.8 3.1 61.6% 66.7% 49.6% 56.7% 38.2% 60.0% 35.5% — 271/275 4.7 3.7 58.0% 69.2% 50.0% 57.8% 45.2% 60.9% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Facundo Bagnis Martin Klizan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1524 104.9 -2.40 -0.79 1.001 50.8% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.04
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1506 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1543 104.5 -2.83 -2.96 0.851 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.11
20 2010 1501 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1607 113.5 +0.26 +1.44 0.780 45.9% — — — 33.3% -0.78 1–1 — — -0.14
21 2011 1500 108.9 -0.66 -2.78 0.812 45.4% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — +0.03 2011 1601 108.6 -3.98 +3.39 0.648 40.3% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.28
22 2012 1517 112.0 -0.08 +1.00 0.903 47.6% — +102 — 28.6% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.29 2012 1793 136.2 -0.83 +2.99 1.092 51.5% -45 -158 -236 52.6% +0.10 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) — +0.80
23 2013 1488 108.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1690 141.7 -2.90 -0.83 0.884 48.1% -55 +13 -130 39.3% -0.74 4–11 (27%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.17
24 2014 1607 119.1 -0.79 -0.08 0.764 46.3% — +17 — 35.3% -1.12 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.10 2014 1930 145.3 +0.98 +1.95 1.050 51.1% -137 +27 -329 56.4% +0.30 10–4 (71%) 11–8 (58%) — -2.11
25 2015 1562 109.1 -3.38 -3.19 0.760 44.7% — +64 — 30.8% -1.38 2–0 0–1 — +0.67 2015 1798 145.6 -2.85 -1.50 0.865 47.5% -11 +44 — 45.3% -0.62 11–6 (65%) 17–5 (77%) — -0.15
26 2016 1641 128.1 -3.12 -0.39 0.865 47.4% — +74 — 36.1% -0.72 1–0 2–5 (29%) — -0.10 2016 1753 151.0 -1.88 +1.38 0.979 50.0% +2 +114 — 52.2% +0.12 6–7 (46%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.22
27 2017 1594 127.3 -2.62 -2.67 0.788 46.0% -62 +97 — 28.2% -1.28 2–4 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.29 2017 1757 144.6 -1.26 +0.29 0.943 49.2% -12 +78 — 47.5% +0.03 4–5 (44%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.38
28 2018 1633 121.6 -0.02 -0.66 0.976 48.8% — +66 — 41.2% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.46 2018 1918 149.4 +0.58 +1.54 1.064 51.4% -96 +77 — 58.2% +0.43 8–2 (80%) 5–3 (63%) — -2.08
29 2019 1630 113.6 -2.00 -2.78 0.765 45.8% — +102 — 26.7% -1.53 1–0 0–1 — +0.21 2019 1702 134.3 -4.15 -1.03 0.853 47.6% +16 +145 — 37.1% -0.73 4–5 (44%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.18
30 2020 1673 120.0 +0.34 +0.61 0.957 48.7% — +68 — 33.3% -0.75 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.21 2020 1649 111.4 -0.19 -1.33 0.847 45.8% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.18
31 2021 1669 126.0 -0.76 -0.06 1.007 50.4% -130 +123 — 50.0% -0.02 2–3 (40%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.28 2021 1541 88.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1644 132.9 -1.83 -0.30 0.974 49.6% -47 +59 — 38.9% -0.48 1–4 (20%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1637 121.0 -3.92 -3.01 0.719 44.9% -49 +88 — 26.9% -1.31 2–2 (50%) 0–5 (0%) — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1649 125.9 +0.16 +0.66 1.030 50.7% — +120 — 64.7% +0.41 0–1 3–2 (60%) — +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1602 108.5 -1.57 +0.51 1.028 50.3% — — — 44.4% -0.11 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.03 2025 1556 101.9 -0.23 -0.93 0.763 47.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.01
Career — 1760 127.1 -1.77 -0.93 0.889 48.0% -71 +87 — 38.2% -0.70 16–22 (42%) 19–39 (33%) 92.6 +1.62 — 1980 146.1 -1.61 +0.42 0.947 49.3% -39 +43 -241 47.5% -0.22 52–48 (52%) 59–55 (52%) 103.7 -1.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.