H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Fernando Gonzalez vs Ronald Agenor H2H: 0-1
Ronald Agenor holds a 1–0 lead over Fernando Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ronald Agenor leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ronald Agenor won the 2000 Santiago third round 6-3 3-6 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
HAI
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2000* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ronald Agenor | 6-3 3-6 7-6(4) | Fernando Gonzalez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Gonzalez | #569 | #5 | 3,285 | 2,088 | 330 | 192 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| Ronald Agenor | #1,507 | #22 | 984 | 1,895 | 215 | 251 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Gonzalez | Ronald Agenor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #412 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #49 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #18 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #23 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #28 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #11 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #37 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2006 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #29 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2007 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #74 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2008 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #15 | 1,863 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #132 | 1,538 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2009 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #11 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 1993 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #58 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2010 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #68 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 | 1994 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #298 | 1,808 | 0 | 11 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #509 | 1,780 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,528 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #96 | 1,522 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #137 | 1,430 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,466 | 0 | 3 |