H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Fernando Gonzalez vs Victor Hanescu H2H: 3-0
Fernando Gonzalez holds a 3–0 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fernando Gonzalez leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2010 Acapulco fourth round 7-6(2) 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 44
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2010* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Fernando Gonzalez | 7-6(2) 3-6 6-1 | Victor Hanescu | Match data |
| Jun 2, 2009* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Fernando Gonzalez | 6-2 6-4 6-2 | Victor Hanescu | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2004* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Fernando Gonzalez | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Victor Hanescu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernando Gonzalez | #569 | #5 | 3,285 | 2,088 | 330 | 192 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| Victor Hanescu | #1,025 | #26 | 1,671 | 1,843 | 186 | 226 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fernando Gonzalez | Victor Hanescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #412 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #18 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #70 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #92 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #23 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #35 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #11 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #646 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2008 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #15 | 1,863 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2009 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #11 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2010 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #68 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #298 | 1,808 | 0 | 11 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #509 | 1,780 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #122 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |