H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fernando Gonzalez vs Victor Hanescu H2H: 3-0

Fernando Gonzalez holds a 3–0 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fernando Gonzalez leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Gonzalez won the 2010 Acapulco fourth round 7-6(2) 3-6 6-1.

CHI Age 45 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 0
3 main draw meetings
ROU Age 44 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 25, 2010* Acapulco ATP 500 R16 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #12 7-6(2) 3-6 6-1 Victor Hanescu #44 Match data
Jun 2, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Fernando Gonzalez #12 6-2 6-4 6-2 Victor Hanescu #33 Match data
Mar 10, 2004* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fernando Gonzalez #27 3-6 6-3 6-4 Victor Hanescu #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Gonzalez #569 #5 3,285 2,088 330 192 63.2% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 186 226 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Gonzalez Victor Hanescu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #412 1,510 0 0
19 2000 8–5 61.5% #115 1,622 0 1
20 2001 5–10 33.3% #139 1,523 0 1 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0
21 2002 40–21 65.6% #18 1,863 0 3 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0
22 2003 31–25 55.4% #35 1,733 0 3 2004 17–23 42.5% #92 1,572 0 0
23 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,728 0 4 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,727 0 0
24 2005 46–21 68.7% #11 1,890 0 7 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,652 0 0
25 2006 47–20 70.1% #10 1,982 0 7 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0
26 2007 33–21 61.1% #7 1,868 0 8 2008 20–21 48.8% #50 1,756 0 1
27 2008 32–15 68.1% #15 1,863 0 10 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,705 0 1
28 2009 39–16 70.9% #11 1,988 0 11 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1
29 2010 13–9 59.1% #68 1,847 0 11 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1
30 2011 3–4 42.9% #298 1,808 0 11 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1
31 2012 3–4 42.9% #509 1,780 0 11 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,689 0 1
32 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,735 0 1
33 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1