H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Fernando Verdasco vs Victor Hanescu H2H: 2-2

Fernando Verdasco and Victor Hanescu are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Victor Hanescu won the 2014 Doha fourth round 4-6 7-6(0) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Victor Hanescu
ROU Age 44 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 2, 2014* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard Victor Hanescu #80 4-6 7-6(0) 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #30 Match data
Mar 16, 2008* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fernando Verdasco #30 4-6 6-4 6-3 Victor Hanescu #71 Match data
Jul 30, 2005* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 QF Clay Fernando Verdasco #68 6-3 6-3 Victor Hanescu #52 Match data
Sep 16, 2004* Bucharest ATP 250 R32 Clay Victor Hanescu #96 7-6(4) 7-6(3) Fernando Verdasco #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 186 226 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fernando Verdasco Victor Hanescu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0
21 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0
22 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1 2004 17–23 42.5% #92 1,572 0 0
23 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,727 0 0
24 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,652 0 0
25 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0
26 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5 2008 20–21 48.8% #50 1,756 0 1
27 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,705 0 1
28 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1
29 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1
30 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1
31 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,689 0 1
32 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,735 0 1
33 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1
34 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7 — — — — — — —
35 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7 — — — — — — —
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7 — — — — — — —