H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Filip Krajinovic vs Matthew Ebden H2H: 0-1
Matthew Ebden holds a 1–0 lead over Filip Krajinovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Matthew Ebden leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Matthew Ebden won the 2018 US Open first round 7-6(1) 6-7(5) 4-6 6-1 4-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2018* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Matthew Ebden | 7-6(1) 6-7(5) 4-6 6-1 4-1 (ret.) | Filip Krajinovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filip Krajinovic | #1,204 | #26 | 1,724 | 1,984 | 115 | 125 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Matthew Ebden | #970 | #39 | 1,134 | 1,849 | 75 | 129 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Filip Krajinovic | Matthew Ebden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #420 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #234 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #105 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #34 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #68 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #94 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–21 | 19.2% | #231 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #40 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #105 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #698 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #42 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #76 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #46 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #311 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #244 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #237 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #740 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |