H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Filip Krajinovic vs Tim Smyczek H2H: 0-1
Tim Smyczek holds a 1–0 lead over Filip Krajinovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tim Smyczek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Smyczek won the 2014 US Open first round 4-6 6-3 6-2 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2014* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Tim Smyczek | 4-6 6-3 6-2 7-6(5) | Filip Krajinovic | Match data |
| Mar 12, 2010* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Tim Smyczek | 6-1 6-0 | Filip Krajinovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filip Krajinovic | #1,204 | #26 | 1,724 | 1,984 | 115 | 125 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tim Smyczek | #862 | #68 | 688 | 1,768 | 43 | 85 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Filip Krajinovic | Tim Smyczek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #420 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #171 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #234 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #34 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #89 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #94 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #115 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #40 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #109 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #140 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #42 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #130 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #311 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #355 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |