H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Filippo Volandri vs Marcos Daniel H2H: 0-1
Marcos Daniel holds a 1–0 lead over Filippo Volandri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcos Daniel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marcos Daniel won the 2008 Warsaw third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2008* | Warsaw | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marcos Daniel | 6-3 6-4 | Filippo Volandri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filippo Volandri | #1,074 | #25 | 1,140 | 1,840 | 167 | 215 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Marcos Daniel | #904 | #56 | 942 | 1,649 | 20 | 63 | 24.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Filippo Volandri | Marcos Daniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #43 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #40 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2008 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,529 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #94 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,562 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #165 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,610 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #69 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #87 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #87 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #71 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–16 | 5.9% | #212 | 1,477 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #904 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |