H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Florent Serra vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 0-1
Lukas Lacko holds a 1–0 lead over Florent Serra in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukas Lacko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukas Lacko won the 2010 New Haven second round 6-1 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 38
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2010* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Lukas Lacko | 6-1 7-6(6) | Florent Serra | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florent Serra | #942 | #36 | 1,371 | 1,816 | 123 | 170 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Lukas Lacko | #1,505 | #44 | 917 | 1,837 | 81 | 133 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Florent Serra | Lukas Lacko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #82 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #89 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #213 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #112 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #51 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #60 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #94 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #65 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #122 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #69 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #92 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #171 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #114 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #183 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |