H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Florent Serra vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 0-1

Lukas Lacko holds a 1–0 lead over Florent Serra in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukas Lacko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukas Lacko won the 2010 New Haven round of 64 6-1 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Florent Serra
FRA Age 45 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lukas Lacko #72 6-1 7-6(6) Florent Serra #65 Match data Aug 24, 2010* R64 New Haven ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Florent Serra #942 #36 1,371 1,811 123 170 42.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Florent Serra Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2003 0–2 0.0% #218 1,467 0 0 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2004 2–3 40.0% #213 1,553 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2005 10–10 50.0% #49 1,653 0 1 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2006 23–26 46.9% #60 1,669 0 2 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2007 16–24 40.0% #92 1,621 0 2 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2008 20–24 45.5% #59 1,690 0 2 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2009 24–29 45.3% #65 1,710 0 2 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2010 19–27 41.3% #69 1,694 0 2 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2011 4–12 25.0% #171 1,633 0 2 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2012 5–8 38.5% #118 1,692 0 2 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
32 2013 0–4 0.0% #218 1,664 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2014 0–1 0.0% #346 1,601 0 2 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Florent Serra Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2005 2 3 5 40.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 2006 12 10 22 54.5% 8 11 19 42.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2007 10 11 21 47.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2008 10 15 25 40.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
28 2009 14 16 30 46.7% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2010 10 16 26 38.5% 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2011 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
31 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 65 91 156 41.7% 48 56 104 46.2% 9 17 26 34.6% 1 6 7 14.3% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 292/293 of Florent Serra's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Florent Serra Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 2003 2/2 3.0 2.0 68.7% 62.7% 47.8% 61.7% 87.5% 57.5% 29.2% 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2004 5/5 2.2 3.6 68.6% 68.4% 36.9% 39.9% 34.8% 58.6% 44.2% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2005 20/20 3.0 2.1 58.7% 65.3% 52.3% 44.5% 47.6% 59.8% 41.2% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2006 49/49 3.3 2.3 59.1% 65.9% 50.4% 56.2% 45.3% 59.6% 38.0% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2007 39/40 4.7 2.1 62.6% 69.6% 51.2% 64.0% 37.1% 63.0% 32.9% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2008 44/44 2.8 1.6 63.6% 66.6% 50.5% 53.8% 36.4% 60.6% 37.2% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2009 53/53 4.1 2.2 61.3% 68.2% 50.7% 59.0% 42.1% 61.5% 35.8% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2010 46/46 4.8 1.9 61.0% 66.2% 51.5% 61.3% 42.1% 60.3% 35.7% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2011 16/16 3.4 1.9 61.6% 67.5% 45.1% 51.6% 35.9% 58.7% 30.8% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 2012 13/13 4.0 2.7 58.8% 64.1% 47.7% 53.1% 43.1% 57.3% 36.5% 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
32 2013 4/4 3.5 1.3 58.3% 66.5% 44.9% 50.7% 30.0% 57.4% 30.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1/1 2.0 0.0 63.0% 55.2% 41.2% 42.9% — 50.0% 27.1% 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
Career — 292/293 3.8 2.0 61.3% 66.9% 50.1% 56.6% 41.1% 60.4% 36.1% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Florent Serra Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 2001 1481 98.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 2002 1452 97.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 2003 1468 102.2 -3.05 -0.03 0.687 46.0% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 0–1 — +0.11 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.83
23 2004 1554 110.6 -0.04 +0.80 1.068 51.0% — +17 — 42.9% +0.14 1–1 0–2 — -0.14 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.54
24 2005 1653 128.7 -1.73 +2.50 1.023 50.3% -88 +19 — 47.2% +0.09 4–4 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.02 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47
25 2006 1669 137.1 -1.41 +1.08 0.941 49.2% -17 -11 -70 46.8% -0.31 9–11 (45%) 9–13 (41%) — -1.88 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.64
26 2007 1622 125.2 -0.74 -2.78 0.888 48.5% +16 -25 -57 42.3% -0.42 11–6 (65%) 7–13 (35%) — +0.32 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19
27 2008 1691 130.4 -1.64 +0.65 0.947 49.0% -16 -10 -125 44.3% -0.48 5–6 (45%) 16–8 (67%) — +0.87 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.16
28 2009 1711 138.9 -1.54 -0.30 0.930 49.0% -16 -35 -165 44.5% -0.37 9–9 (50%) 10–14 (42%) — -2.27 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2010 1695 142.7 -1.33 -0.81 0.899 48.3% -7 +12 -156 43.8% -0.33 8–8 (50%) 12–9 (57%) — -2.81 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2011 1634 117.1 -2.98 -3.39 0.747 45.3% -14 +77 — 21.6% -1.81 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.05 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.00
31 2012 1693 122.8 -3.34 +0.02 0.854 47.8% -58 — — 25.8% -1.42 2–1 (67%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.48 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 2013 1665 120.4 -2.03 -1.38 0.718 44.2% +30 — — 9.1% -2.36 — 1–1 — -0.35 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1601 107.7 +0.76 -0.36 0.542 38.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.18 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 2015 1595 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1812 133.6 -1.55 -0.29 0.913 48.6% -16 -6 -107 41.8% -0.50 51–49 (51%) 61–73 (46%) 100.5 -2.30 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.