H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Florent Serra vs Marcos Daniel H2H: 1-1
Florent Serra and Marcos Daniel are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marcos Daniel leads 1–0 on clay, while Florent Serra leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcos Daniel won the 2009 Gstaad quarterfinal 6-4 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2009* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Marcos Daniel | 6-4 7-6(1) | Florent Serra | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2008* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Florent Serra | 6-1 6-2 | Marcos Daniel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florent Serra | #942 | #36 | 1,371 | 1,816 | 123 | 170 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Marcos Daniel | #904 | #56 | 942 | 1,649 | 20 | 63 | 24.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Florent Serra | Marcos Daniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #213 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #60 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2007 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #94 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #165 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #65 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #69 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #87 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #171 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #87 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #904 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |