H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Adrian Voinea H2H: 3-1

Francisco Clavet holds a 3–1 lead over Adrian Voinea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Francisco Clavet leads 3–0 on clay, while Adrian Voinea leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Adrian Voinea won the 2002 Long Island round of 64 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Adrian Voinea
ROU Age 52 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Adrian Voinea #63 6-2 6-1 Francisco Clavet #83 Match data Aug 21, 2002* R64 Long Island ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Francisco Clavet #30 6-3 6-4 Adrian Voinea #75 Match data Aug 3, 1996* SF Dutch Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Francisco Clavet #37 6-2 7-6(4) Adrian Voinea #56 Match data Sep 29, 1995* R16 Palermo ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Francisco Clavet #50 6-4 6-1 Adrian Voinea #236 Match data Nov 5, 1994* QF Montevideo ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Adrian Voinea #1,046 #36 957 1,755 126 168 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Adrian Voinea
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,458 0 0 1994 2–4 33.3% #202 1,492 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,502 0 0 1995 13–19 40.6% #56 1,567 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1996 28–25 52.8% #45 1,709 0 0
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,752 0 1 1997 12–20 37.5% #139 1,629 0 0
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,758 0 1 1998 11–9 55.0% #71 1,675 0 0
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,655 0 1 1999 14–21 40.0% #100 1,650 0 1
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,794 0 1 2000 9–20 31.0% #110 1,552 0 1
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,738 0 2 2001 11–11 50.0% #97 1,625 0 1
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,743 0 3 2002 18–20 47.4% #68 1,635 0 1
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,833 0 5 2003 8–19 29.6% #154 1,531 0 1
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,808 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,700 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,565 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Francisco Clavet Adrian Voinea
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1989 — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7%
21 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
22 1991 16 11 27 59.3% 21 13 34 61.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 24 14 38 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1998 4 4 8 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1993 2 7 9 22.2% 19 18 37 51.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 2 6 8 25.0% 12 12 24 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1994 1 1 2 50.0% 26 18 44 59.1% — — — — — — — — 2000 6 10 16 37.5% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 1995 4 4 8 50.0% 27 21 48 56.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2001 5 6 11 45.5% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — —
27 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 29 16 45 64.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2002 7 7 14 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 28 12 40 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 5 7 12 41.7% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1998 9 9 18 50.0% 31 15 46 67.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 8 13 21 38.1% 19 12 31 61.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 9 14 23 39.1% 16 13 29 55.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 18 13 31 58.1% 5 12 17 29.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 103 115 218 47.2% 265 194 459 57.7% 11 11 22 50.0% 9 20 29 31.0% — 47 61 108 43.5% 65 75 140 46.4% 5 14 19 26.3% 9 18 27 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 586/686 of Francisco Clavet's and 259/294 of Adrian Voinea's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Francisco Clavet Adrian Voinea
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 5/6 2.0 0.6 66.1% 60.2% 41.2% 41.5% 51.4% 53.7% 43.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 28/32 5.8 3.0 59.0% 67.6% 51.2% 59.1% 44.9% 60.9% 37.4%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 46/53 5.2 2.9 58.6% 68.6% 50.9% 57.9% 40.5% 61.3% 36.8%
22 1991 57/64 1.3 1.7 64.4% 65.1% 54.4% 58.6% 47.8% 61.1% 43.6% 1997 30/32 5.9 3.4 56.9% 64.2% 45.8% 47.6% 40.5% 56.2% 38.0%
23 1992 61/68 1.4 2.4 61.5% 66.2% 51.5% 55.4% 45.8% 60.4% 41.4% 1998 16/20 4.8 2.4 56.2% 67.6% 53.3% 60.5% 52.9% 61.4% 36.2%
24 1993 41/47 0.8 2.5 63.3% 60.2% 47.3% 51.1% 47.9% 55.4% 40.8% 1999 31/35 5.5 3.1 53.9% 69.8% 49.1% 49.1% 46.5% 60.0% 37.7%
25 1994 38/46 0.9 2.3 66.3% 64.0% 50.8% 54.9% 42.3% 59.4% 41.5% 2000 25/29 6.1 3.4 58.8% 69.5% 45.7% 51.9% 36.5% 59.7% 33.6%
26 1995 50/58 1.7 2.2 63.2% 65.6% 52.4% 53.6% 43.7% 60.5% 43.2% 2001 20/22 4.6 3.1 53.8% 70.6% 49.8% 50.7% 42.8% 61.4% 38.4%
27 1996 57/65 1.7 2.1 62.7% 65.2% 54.2% 52.7% 50.0% 61.3% 40.1% 2002 32/38 6.2 4.2 54.9% 69.6% 50.0% 54.7% 34.0% 60.6% 36.5%
28 1997 57/65 2.3 2.7 64.2% 65.4% 51.0% 52.4% 49.3% 60.2% 42.3% 2003 26/27 5.6 3.8 56.6% 68.5% 46.9% 50.4% 49.2% 58.9% 33.1%
29 1998 55/69 2.6 2.3 63.0% 68.0% 53.4% 57.1% 48.9% 62.6% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 48/57 2.4 2.1 63.9% 66.7% 54.4% 56.9% 43.2% 62.0% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 48/58 2.1 1.7 63.3% 68.2% 54.3% 52.5% 43.2% 63.1% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 43/50 2.1 1.5 61.5% 66.1% 57.1% 59.7% 43.8% 62.5% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 25/33 2.0 2.4 66.9% 63.6% 49.1% 53.6% 38.6% 58.5% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2003 6/6 1.8 2.2 64.4% 59.0% 46.9% 53.6% 48.3% 54.4% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 586/728 1.8 2.2 63.5% 65.5% 52.6% 54.9% 45.9% 60.7% 41.0% — 259/294 5.5 3.2 56.9% 68.3% 49.0% 53.3% 42.5% 59.9% 36.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Francisco Clavet Adrian Voinea
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1988 1459 97.0 — — — — — +62 — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.84 1994 1493 101.4 -1.67 -1.23 0.933 48.4% — +28 — 33.3% -1.33 1–0 — — +0.43
20 1989 1503 119.2 — — — — — +47 — 51.9% +0.11 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.79 1995 1567 132.5 -0.38 -0.66 0.956 49.2% -80 +132 — 46.5% -0.26 3–8 (27%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.33
21 1990 1576 125.5 — — — — -79 +53 — 46.3% -0.31 4–7 (36%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.01 1996 1710 138.7 -0.34 -0.30 0.952 49.5% -44 +61 -144 54.8% +0.16 8–9 (47%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.48
22 1991 1753 137.7 +0.53 +3.48 1.123 52.2% -104 +39 — 56.1% +0.66 9–7 (56%) 12–12 (50%) — +1.58 1997 1629 126.5 -4.51 +0.39 0.866 47.2% +72 +45 -86 35.9% -0.96 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — -1.87
23 1992 1758 149.6 -0.34 +2.57 1.046 50.7% -49 +112 — 53.9% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.12 1998 1675 130.7 -0.22 -0.64 0.938 49.0% +39 +25 — 51.1% -0.13 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.07
24 1993 1656 131.7 -3.73 +1.81 0.914 48.1% -52 +101 — 44.7% -0.47 9–8 (53%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19 1999 1651 125.5 -1.16 -0.03 0.943 48.8% -39 +66 — 43.6% -0.42 8–11 (42%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.55
25 1994 1794 140.9 +0.11 +1.74 1.023 50.1% — +77 — 55.9% +0.31 12–9 (57%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.48 2000 1553 120.2 -1.75 -2.79 0.834 46.7% +49 +58 — 34.3% -1.00 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.04
26 1995 1739 138.9 +0.04 +3.63 1.094 51.5% -102 +36 — 52.2% +0.30 7–13 (35%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.51 2001 1625 126.7 -0.04 -0.19 0.995 49.0% -8 +38 — 43.5% -0.44 3–2 (60%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.45
27 1996 1744 149.6 -0.07 +1.86 1.036 50.6% -95 +130 — 56.8% +0.41 4–8 (33%) 12–5 (71%) — -1.96 2002 1636 128.1 -1.48 -0.75 0.926 48.6% +17 +4 -151 47.2% -0.24 8–5 (62%) 11–8 (58%) — -0.15
28 1997 1833 145.8 -0.25 +3.69 1.064 51.3% -124 +88 -238 56.2% +0.47 19–9 (68%) 12–11 (52%) — -1.22 2003 1531 117.5 -3.51 -2.55 0.805 46.6% +84 +19 — 37.9% -0.88 2–4 (33%) 9–6 (60%) — -0.56
29 1998 1809 143.1 +0.62 +1.82 1.096 51.5% -108 +102 -151 58.4% +0.60 12–11 (52%) 7–16 (30%) — +2.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 1701 145.3 +0.45 +2.02 1.047 50.5% -14 +100 -25 51.3% +0.07 13–14 (48%) 14–12 (54%) — -2.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 1628 141.7 +0.86 +2.56 1.091 51.3% -11 +144 +39 49.6% +0.11 6–9 (40%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 1621 142.4 +0.69 +1.35 1.049 50.8% +64 -7 — 45.0% +0.02 8–8 (50%) 7–14 (33%) — +0.10 2007 1495 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 1564 130.1 -1.84 -0.91 0.869 47.5% +66 +2 — 37.6% -0.63 4–8 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2003 1566 114.4 -1.08 +0.90 0.894 47.9% +83 — — 30.8% -1.77 0–2 — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1870 146.4 -0.14 +2.31 1.045 50.7% -39 +82 -98 51.9% +0.19 122–126 (49%) 122–122 (50%) 97.5 -0.54 — 1756 133.6 -1.52 -0.78 0.913 48.4% +4 +53 -131 44.5% -0.43 43–49 (47%) 63–54 (54%) 104.1 -0.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.