H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Alex Corretja H2H: 3-6

Alex Corretja holds a 6–3 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Alex Corretja leads 5–3 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 2000 Hamburg Masters fourth round 6-4 6-1.

ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 6
9 main draw meetings
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 20, 2000* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Francisco Clavet #55 6-4 6-1 Alex Corretja #11 Match data
Oct 4, 1997* Palermo ATP 250 QF Clay Alex Corretja #9 7-6(4) 6-2 Francisco Clavet #45 Match data
Aug 21, 1997* Boston ATP 250 R32 Hard Alex Corretja #6 6-3 6-4 Francisco Clavet #53 Match data
May 8, 1997* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Alex Corretja #11 3-6 6-4 7-5 Francisco Clavet #27 Match data
Apr 13, 1997* Estoril ATP 250 F Clay Alex Corretja #21 6-3 7-5 Francisco Clavet #35 Match data
Nov 12, 1994* Buenos Aires ATP 250 SF Clay Alex Corretja #25 7-6(3) 1-6 6-3 Francisco Clavet #44 Match data
Oct 29, 1994* Santiago ATP 250 SF Clay Francisco Clavet #65 2-6 7-5 6-4 Alex Corretja #25 Match data
Nov 6, 1993* Sao Paulo ATP 250 QF Clay Alex Corretja #90 6-2 6-0 Francisco Clavet #109 Match data
Jun 18, 1993* Genova ATP 250 R16 Clay Francisco Clavet #43 6-1 6-3 Alex Corretja #76 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Alex Corretja #1,110 #2 3,550 2,002 415 277 60.0% 0 2 1 0 14 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Alex Corretja
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 11–13 45.8% #86 1,566 0 0
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1993 24–23 51.1% #76 1,658 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1994 44–22 66.7% #22 1,848 0 1
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1995 25–27 48.1% #48 1,714 0 1
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1996 37–26 58.7% #23 1,783 0 1
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1997 49–23 68.1% #12 1,822 0 4
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1998 53–20 72.6% #3 1,962 0 9
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1999 33–22 60.0% #26 1,771 0 9
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 2000 50–18 73.5% #8 1,940 0 14
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 2001 30–20 60.0% #16 1,781 0 15
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2002 35–17 67.3% #19 1,851 0 17
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2003 11–22 33.3% #100 1,650 0 17
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2004 12–19 38.7% #114 1,623 0 17
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2005 1–5 16.7% #525 1,571 0 17
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8