H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Francisco Clavet vs Andrei Pavel H2H: 1-2
Andrei Pavel holds a 2–1 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrei Pavel leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Pavel won the 2002 Indianapolis third round 6-4 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2002 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Andrei Pavel | 6-4 2-6 6-3 | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2001* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Andrei Pavel | 7-5 6-4 | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1998* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Francisco Clavet | 6-7(10) 6-4 7-5 6-2 | Andrei Pavel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | #911 | #18 | 1,613 | 1,869 | 388 | 340 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Andrei Pavel | #890 | #13 | 1,550 | 1,904 | 249 | 248 | 50.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Clavet | Andrei Pavel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #489 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #408 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #214 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 39–29 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #100 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #68 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #38 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #41 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,788 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1996 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #34 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1997 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #33 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #26 | 1,801 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #69 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1999 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,701 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #18 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2000 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #80 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2001 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,620 | 0 | 8 | 2006 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #113 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2002 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1142 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #600 | 1,561 | 0 | 3 |