H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Francisco Clavet vs Byron Black H2H: 0-1
Byron Black holds a 1–0 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Byron Black leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Byron Black won the 1994 US Open second round 7-5 1-6 3-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 57
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1994* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Byron Black | 7-5 1-6 3-6 6-1 6-4 | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | #911 | #18 | 1,613 | 1,869 | 388 | 340 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francisco Clavet | Byron Black | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1990 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 39–29 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #100 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #38 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #34 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1997 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #33 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1999 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,701 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2000 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2001 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,620 | 0 | 8 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2002 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,567 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |