H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Davide Sanguinetti H2H: 3-1

Francisco Clavet holds a 3–1 lead over Davide Sanguinetti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Francisco Clavet leads 3–0 on clay, while Davide Sanguinetti leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 1998 Mexico City quarterfinal 7-6(1) 7-5.

ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 31, 1998* Mexico City ATP 250 QF Clay Francisco Clavet #29 7-6(1) 7-5 Davide Sanguinetti #48 Match data
Jul 1, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Davide Sanguinetti #65 7-6(3) 6-1 6-4 Francisco Clavet #36 Match data
Nov 1, 1997* Bogota ATP 250 SF Clay Francisco Clavet #35 6-3 6-7(4) 7-6(3) Davide Sanguinetti #93 Match data
Oct 2, 1997* Palermo ATP 250 R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #45 6-3 6-1 Davide Sanguinetti #93 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Davide Sanguinetti #1,080 #42 874 1,771 157 233 40.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Davide Sanguinetti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1994 0–2 0.0% #177 1,482 0 0
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1995 0–3 0.0% #290 1,455 0 0
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1997 5–11 31.2% #95 1,497 0 0
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1998 29–27 51.8% #48 1,675 0 0
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 1999 8–23 25.8% #120 1,560 0 0
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 2000 17–21 44.7% #65 1,639 0 0
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2001 10–27 27.0% #91 1,528 0 0
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2002 22–21 51.2% #46 1,620 0 2
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2003 16–21 43.2% #65 1,620 0 2
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2004 11–20 35.5% #110 1,588 0 2
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 2005 25–25 50.0% #44 1,710 0 2
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 2006 9–24 27.3% #107 1,547 0 2
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 2007 5–8 38.5% #270 1,519 0 2