H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Marcelo Rios H2H: 1-4

Marcelo Rios holds a 4–1 lead over Francisco Clavet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 4–0 on clay, while Francisco Clavet leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 2000 Hamburg Masters quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
CHI Age 50 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 21, 2000* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Marcelo Rios #20 6-4 6-3 Francisco Clavet #55 Match data
Jul 11, 1998* Gstaad ATP 250 QF Clay Marcelo Rios #2 6-3 7-5 Francisco Clavet #29 Match data
Jun 24, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Francisco Clavet #36 6-3 3-6 7-5 3-6 6-3 Marcelo Rios #2 Match data
May 25, 1996* St. Poelten ATP 250 QF Clay Marcelo Rios #10 6-2 1-6 6-3 Francisco Clavet #44 Match data
Apr 24, 1996* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Marcelo Rios #13 6-4 5-7 6-4 Francisco Clavet #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Marcelo Rios #994 #1 3,719 2,137 366 179 67.2% 0 5 1 0 12 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Marcelo Rios
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1994 12–11 52.2% #107 1,615 0 0
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1995 38–20 65.5% #25 1,769 0 3
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1996 52–25 67.5% #11 1,835 0 4
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1997 54–26 67.5% #10 1,868 0 5
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1998 66–18 78.6% #2 1,948 0 12
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1999 45–16 73.8% #9 1,916 0 15
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 2000 28–19 59.6% #37 1,813 0 16
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 2001 28–19 59.6% #39 1,836 0 18
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 2002 31–19 62.0% #24 1,820 0 18
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 2003 12–6 66.7% #105 1,809 0 18
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8