H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Francisco Clavet vs Thomas Enqvist H2H: 3-2

Francisco Clavet holds a 3–2 lead over Thomas Enqvist in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Francisco Clavet leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Enqvist won the 2002 Marseille third round 6-3 1-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 14, 2002* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Thomas Enqvist #24 6-3 1-6 6-2 Francisco Clavet #57 Match data
Jun 30, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Thomas Enqvist #8 7-6(2) 7-6(6) 7-5 Francisco Clavet #42 Match data
May 18, 2000* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #55 7-6(3) 6-4 Thomas Enqvist #8 Match data
Apr 22, 1999* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Francisco Clavet #21 6-2 6-0 Thomas Enqvist #15 Match data
Feb 20, 1997* Antwerp ATP 250 R32 Hard Francisco Clavet #34 4-6 7-6(4) 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #8 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francisco Clavet Thomas Enqvist
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1
19 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2
20 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2
21 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7
22 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10
23 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11
24 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13
25 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16
26 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18
27 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18
28 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19
29 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19
30 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19
31 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19
32 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —
34 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8 — — — — — — —