H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Frank Dancevic vs Daniel Brands

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Frank Dancevic vs Daniel Brands.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Frank Dancevic
CAN Age 41 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Daniel Brands
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Brands #153 7-5 7-6(5) Frank Dancevic #224 Match data Aug 30, 2016* Q2 Q US Open Grand Slam Hard
Daniel Brands #120 6-7(4) 6-4 7-5 Frank Dancevic #165 Match data Jan 14, 2013 Q1 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Frank Dancevic #406 #65 783 1,771 54 90 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daniel Brands #1,055 #51 896 1,886 58 93 38.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Frank Dancevic Daniel Brands
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2002 1–2 33.3% — 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 0–1 0.0% #201 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 1–2 33.3% #171 1,486 0 0 2007 1–1 50.0% #220 1,491 0 0
20 2005 2–6 25.0% #188 1,472 0 0 2008 1–4 20.0% #150 1,539 0 0
21 2006 6–9 40.0% #88 1,557 0 0 2009 7–5 58.3% #92 1,645 0 0
22 2007 16–18 47.1% #72 1,696 0 0 2010 9–19 32.1% #104 1,670 0 0
23 2008 6–11 35.3% #130 1,652 0 0 2011 4–11 26.7% #110 1,690 0 0
24 2009 9–11 45.0% #143 1,698 0 0 2012 5–8 38.5% #153 1,688 0 0
25 2010 2–3 40.0% #269 1,663 0 0 2013 23–23 50.0% #54 1,809 0 0
26 2011 2–6 25.0% #151 1,696 0 0 2014 2–11 15.4% #329 1,713 0 0
27 2012 1–5 16.7% #165 1,604 0 0 2015 2–1 66.7% #159 1,729 0 0
28 2013 2–3 40.0% #122 1,687 0 0 2016 2–4 33.3% #168 1,660 0 0
29 2014 2–6 25.0% #149 1,654 0 0 2017 1–4 20.0% #320 1,664 0 0
30 2015 0–3 0.0% #209 1,601 0 0 2018 0–1 0.0% #182 1,616 0 0
31 2016 3–3 50.0% #241 1,663 0 0 2019 1–1 50.0% #465 1,605 0 0
32 2017 1–1 50.0% #363 1,658 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Frank Dancevic Daniel Brands
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2005 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2006 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2007 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
23 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 4 5 9 44.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2009 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
25 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2015 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2014 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2015 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 32 61 93 34.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 21 23 44 47.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — 30 49 79 38.0% 21 34 55 38.2% 7 10 17 41.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 143/144 of Frank Dancevic's and 151/151 of Daniel Brands's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Frank Dancevic Daniel Brands
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2002 3/3 6.7 3.7 49.8% 68.8% 44.1% 52.2% 45.1% 56.5% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1/1 8.0 5.0 49.1% 73.1% 44.4% 69.2% 30.8% 58.5% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 3/3 3.0 3.0 63.1% 75.9% 37.7% 39.9% 14.3% 61.5% 29.3% 2007 2/2 7.5 2.0 64.3% 87.8% 59.9% 100.0% 16.7% 77.8% 23.5%
20 2005 8/8 6.1 2.3 57.1% 66.2% 48.8% 55.0% 26.3% 58.1% 34.5% 2008 5/5 8.0 4.4 61.7% 75.9% 40.5% 48.6% 34.2% 63.2% 30.6%
21 2006 15/15 6.3 1.3 62.8% 70.9% 52.0% 60.1% 37.9% 64.0% 34.1% 2009 12/12 8.3 3.3 67.9% 76.6% 51.4% 69.8% 37.8% 68.6% 34.8%
22 2007 34/34 12.4 2.5 60.2% 75.4% 52.3% 59.8% 38.5% 66.0% 34.1% 2010 28/28 9.3 3.0 64.5% 69.9% 53.9% 57.0% 31.5% 63.9% 29.5%
23 2008 16/17 9.4 2.1 61.3% 73.3% 51.1% 65.5% 37.9% 64.5% 32.8% 2011 15/15 7.0 3.0 68.7% 68.6% 47.4% 57.3% 31.0% 61.7% 28.0%
24 2009 20/20 7.5 1.6 60.8% 74.2% 54.4% 56.4% 38.6% 66.5% 31.5% 2012 13/13 11.1 3.8 63.0% 76.4% 48.5% 49.4% 35.6% 66.2% 31.8%
25 2010 5/5 8.4 2.8 56.2% 75.4% 49.5% 63.0% 34.7% 63.8% 32.3% 2013 46/46 8.5 2.2 66.8% 72.9% 53.0% 57.6% 35.3% 66.2% 33.4%
26 2011 8/8 10.5 3.1 58.6% 68.7% 50.2% 52.8% 27.1% 60.8% 29.8% 2014 13/13 9.2 1.8 69.7% 68.9% 50.3% 62.1% 22.8% 62.9% 29.5%
27 2012 6/6 4.7 2.8 55.1% 61.7% 41.1% 49.4% 45.8% 52.1% 20.7% 2015 3/3 7.3 3.3 54.4% 75.4% 62.8% 43.8% 27.8% 71.2% 37.0%
28 2013 5/5 9.6 2.8 62.4% 69.0% 48.7% 61.0% 40.8% 61.5% 35.4% 2016 6/6 12.3 5.0 64.1% 72.7% 51.2% 59.5% 53.3% 64.7% 32.0%
29 2014 8/8 7.1 3.9 58.2% 67.9% 46.4% 51.2% 34.5% 58.9% 29.1% 2017 5/5 7.0 5.2 64.9% 70.4% 41.0% 62.4% 23.2% 59.4% 29.4%
30 2015 3/3 5.3 3.0 59.3% 71.1% 43.1% 55.0% 33.3% 59.6% 28.3% 2018 1/1 13.0 4.0 71.7% 70.4% 64.3% 66.7% 0.0% 68.7% 28.6%
31 2016 6/6 6.3 1.7 62.1% 74.2% 56.7% 71.1% 24.7% 67.9% 30.5% 2019 2/2 8.0 3.0 66.9% 67.0% 55.3% 66.7% 43.8% 63.0% 35.5%
32 2017 2/2 5.0 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 44.3% 50.0% 22.2% 65.7% 26.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 143/144 8.6 2.3 59.9% 72.1% 50.4% 58.3% 35.7% 63.4% 31.9% — 151/151 8.8 3.0 66.0% 72.3% 51.4% 58.5% 33.1% 65.1% 31.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Frank Dancevic Daniel Brands
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2002 1506 104.6 +0.04 -3.24 0.682 44.0% +22 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1497 102.3 +2.47 -1.76 0.878 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1486 103.8 -0.52 -3.23 0.760 44.9% — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.16 2007 1492 106.0 -2.82 -3.49 1.057 51.7% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
20 2005 1473 101.3 -2.56 -1.42 0.825 46.8% +33 — — 27.8% -1.28 1–1 1–1 — +0.82 2008 1540 111.5 -1.86 -1.37 0.830 46.7% — +37 — 25.0% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.09
21 2006 1558 120.1 +0.72 -1.24 0.948 48.9% -17 — +44 46.2% -0.31 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.23 2009 1645 119.5 +2.51 -1.77 1.108 51.4% — +44 — 53.3% +0.30 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.22
22 2007 1697 136.2 +2.37 -1.18 1.003 49.7% -6 — -95 48.4% -0.16 8–8 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.87 2010 1671 129.6 +0.41 -4.53 0.817 46.9% -109 -45 +44 34.3% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.34
23 2008 1653 126.4 +1.17 -2.13 0.925 49.7% -7 — +11 44.7% -0.34 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.19 2011 1691 120.3 -1.58 -5.51 0.732 45.6% -31 -86 — 27.8% -1.61 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.41
24 2009 1699 134.9 +1.81 -2.41 0.940 48.8% +28 — +6 43.5% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.65 2012 1689 117.4 +1.52 -2.94 0.940 48.7% +10 -50 — 45.5% -0.36 1–3 (25%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.51
25 2010 1663 112.5 -0.81 -0.02 0.891 48.2% — — +83 50.0% -0.42 0–2 3–0 (100%) — -0.03 2013 1809 149.3 +2.79 -2.73 0.988 49.7% -11 +4 -192 47.8% -0.11 7–5 (58%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.24
26 2011 1696 122.6 -2.16 -3.36 0.759 45.7% +7 — — 36.4% -0.95 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.72 2014 1713 128.9 -0.97 -3.58 0.796 46.4% +3 — — 33.3% -1.28 0–6 (0%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.62
27 2012 1605 113.3 -3.12 -6.61 0.432 37.6% +71 — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.47 2015 1729 122.1 +0.44 +1.03 1.284 52.5% +26 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 1–0 — -0.11
28 2013 1688 118.1 -0.19 -0.40 0.918 48.5% +6 — — 43.8% -0.44 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.09 2016 1661 117.0 +0.34 -3.35 0.907 48.9% +50 — — 42.1% -0.32 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.06
29 2014 1655 115.5 -2.84 -3.79 0.710 44.6% +4 — — 33.3% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12 2017 1665 110.8 -1.31 -3.25 0.724 45.2% — — — 16.7% -1.42 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.08
30 2015 1602 110.2 -0.20 -3.32 0.701 44.7% +41 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.04 2018 1616 97.9 +1.38 +0.15 0.912 48.0% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.04
31 2016 1663 114.3 -0.72 -0.87 0.948 49.4% — — +100 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.11 2019 1605 109.1 +0.20 -3.04 0.961 49.1% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.28
32 2017 1658 105.5 -0.71 -1.04 0.776 46.9% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1596 104.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1590 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1577 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1772 127.2 +0.40 -2.03 0.872 47.8% +8 — +18 41.8% -0.57 23–32 (42%) 38–34 (53%) 98.0 +1.31 — 1886 131.0 +0.91 -3.27 0.900 48.3% -25 -9 -63 40.4% -0.64 18–26 (41%) 43–43 (50%) 98.0 -2.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.