H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Frank Dancevic vs Marcos Daniel H2H: 1-0

Frank Dancevic holds a 1–0 lead over Marcos Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Frank Dancevic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Frank Dancevic won the 2006 Japan Open round of 64 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Frank Dancevic
CAN Age 41 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Marcos Daniel
BRA Age 48 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Frank Dancevic #88 6-4 6-4 Marcos Daniel #113 Match data Oct 4, 2006* R64 Japan Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Frank Dancevic #406 #65 783 1,771 54 90 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marcos Daniel #904 #56 942 1,645 20 64 23.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Frank Dancevic Marcos Daniel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2002 1–2 33.3% — 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 0–1 0.0% #201 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 1–2 33.3% #171 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 2–6 25.0% #188 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2006 6–9 40.0% #88 1,557 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2007 16–18 47.1% #72 1,696 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2008 6–11 35.3% #130 1,652 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #236 1,485 0 0
24 2009 9–11 45.0% #143 1,698 0 0 2003 1–3 25.0% #169 1,504 0 0
25 2010 2–3 40.0% #269 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2011 2–6 25.0% #151 1,696 0 0 2005 0–2 0.0% #94 1,520 0 0
27 2012 1–5 16.7% #165 1,604 0 0 2006 5–16 23.8% #165 1,445 0 0
28 2013 2–3 40.0% #122 1,687 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #118 1,517 0 0
29 2014 2–6 25.0% #149 1,654 0 0 2008 6–15 28.6% #87 1,509 0 0
30 2015 0–3 0.0% #209 1,601 0 0 2009 6–12 33.3% #87 1,602 0 0
31 2016 3–3 50.0% #241 1,663 0 0 2010 2–10 16.7% #96 1,498 0 0
32 2017 1–1 50.0% #363 1,658 0 0 2011 0–3 0.0% #904 1,484 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Frank Dancevic Marcos Daniel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2009 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 0 5 5 0.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2014 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 0 5 5 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2015 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 5 6 16.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2010 0 3 3 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2017 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 32 61 93 34.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 21 23 44 47.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — 1 23 24 4.2% 18 35 53 34.0% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 143/144 of Frank Dancevic's and 83/84 of Marcos Daniel's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Frank Dancevic Marcos Daniel
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2002 3/3 6.7 3.7 49.8% 68.8% 44.1% 52.2% 45.1% 56.5% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1/1 8.0 5.0 49.1% 73.1% 44.4% 69.2% 30.8% 58.5% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 3/3 3.0 3.0 63.1% 75.9% 37.7% 39.9% 14.3% 61.5% 29.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 8/8 6.1 2.3 57.1% 66.2% 48.8% 55.0% 26.3% 58.1% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 15/15 6.3 1.3 62.8% 70.9% 52.0% 60.1% 37.9% 64.0% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 34/34 12.4 2.5 60.2% 75.4% 52.3% 59.8% 38.5% 66.0% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 16/17 9.4 2.1 61.3% 73.3% 51.1% 65.5% 37.9% 64.5% 32.8% 2002 1/1 2.0 1.0 49.3% 62.2% 52.6% 81.3% 100.0% 57.3% 29.1%
24 2009 20/20 7.5 1.6 60.8% 74.2% 54.4% 56.4% 38.6% 66.5% 31.5% 2003 4/4 3.3 3.0 64.4% 64.1% 42.5% 61.3% 58.8% 55.9% 34.7%
25 2010 5/5 8.4 2.8 56.2% 75.4% 49.5% 63.0% 34.7% 63.8% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 8/8 10.5 3.1 58.6% 68.7% 50.2% 52.8% 27.1% 60.8% 29.8% 2005 2/2 2.0 4.0 59.2% 60.5% 53.6% 73.1% 31.3% 57.6% 27.0%
27 2012 6/6 4.7 2.8 55.1% 61.7% 41.1% 49.4% 45.8% 52.1% 20.7% 2006 21/21 3.8 1.6 65.0% 62.3% 45.2% 43.5% 49.4% 57.0% 34.8%
28 2013 5/5 9.6 2.8 62.4% 69.0% 48.7% 61.0% 40.8% 61.5% 35.4% 2007 2/2 1.5 2.0 59.0% 59.3% 35.3% 41.4% 0.0% 49.5% 29.6%
29 2014 8/8 7.1 3.9 58.2% 67.9% 46.4% 51.2% 34.5% 58.9% 29.1% 2008 20/21 4.6 1.7 60.8% 68.3% 48.5% 58.7% 29.8% 60.7% 32.9%
30 2015 3/3 5.3 3.0 59.3% 71.1% 43.1% 55.0% 33.3% 59.6% 28.3% 2009 18/18 5.4 2.9 59.6% 68.5% 50.4% 53.1% 45.6% 61.3% 30.7%
31 2016 6/6 6.3 1.7 62.1% 74.2% 56.7% 71.1% 24.7% 67.9% 30.5% 2010 12/12 5.3 2.3 59.2% 68.8% 40.5% 54.2% 48.6% 56.6% 32.0%
32 2017 2/2 5.0 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 44.3% 50.0% 22.2% 65.7% 26.6% 2011 3/3 0.0 1.0 63.2% 39.2% 22.9% 20.0% 25.0% 32.7% 29.7%
Career — 143/144 8.6 2.3 59.9% 72.1% 50.4% 58.3% 35.7% 63.4% 31.9% — 83/84 4.3 2.1 61.4% 65.2% 45.5% 51.9% 42.3% 57.7% 32.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Frank Dancevic Marcos Daniel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2002 1506 104.6 +0.04 -3.24 0.682 44.0% +22 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1497 102.3 +2.47 -1.76 0.878 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1486 103.8 -0.52 -3.23 0.760 44.9% — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1473 101.3 -2.56 -1.42 0.825 46.8% +33 — — 27.8% -1.28 1–1 1–1 — +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 1558 120.1 +0.72 -1.24 0.948 48.9% -17 — +44 46.2% -0.31 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 1697 136.2 +2.37 -1.18 1.003 49.7% -6 — -95 48.4% -0.16 8–8 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 1653 126.4 +1.17 -2.13 0.925 49.7% -7 — +11 44.7% -0.34 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.19 2002 1485 92.6 -1.32 -3.35 0.682 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18
24 2009 1699 134.9 +1.81 -2.41 0.940 48.8% +28 — +6 43.5% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.65 2003 1505 109.2 -2.90 -0.82 0.787 46.9% — — — 36.4% -0.82 0–1 1–1 — -0.36
25 2010 1663 112.5 -0.81 -0.02 0.891 48.2% — — +83 50.0% -0.42 0–2 3–0 (100%) — -0.03 2004 1500 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 1696 122.6 -2.16 -3.36 0.759 45.7% +7 — — 36.4% -0.95 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.72 2005 1521 115.5 +1.61 +4.56 0.637 44.2% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — 0–2 — -0.44
27 2012 1605 113.3 -3.12 -6.61 0.432 37.6% +71 — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.47 2006 1445 121.5 -3.69 -2.29 0.809 46.3% -8 +103 — 31.9% -1.11 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.06
28 2013 1688 118.1 -0.19 -0.40 0.918 48.5% +6 — — 43.8% -0.44 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.09 2007 1518 113.4 -0.91 -2.00 0.586 38.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09
29 2014 1655 115.5 -2.84 -3.79 0.710 44.6% +4 — — 33.3% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12 2008 1510 113.6 -1.79 -3.23 0.835 47.0% -113 +95 — 31.9% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.25
30 2015 1602 110.2 -0.20 -3.32 0.701 44.7% +41 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.04 2009 1602 132.8 -1.64 -3.70 0.794 46.6% -199 +110 — 31.7% -1.20 1–1 4–1 (80%) — -0.60
31 2016 1663 114.3 -0.72 -0.87 0.948 49.4% — — +100 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.11 2010 1499 111.5 -3.07 -3.09 0.739 45.5% -106 +119 -65 26.7% -1.43 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.32
32 2017 1658 105.5 -0.71 -1.04 0.776 46.9% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.57 2011 1485 99.5 -5.19 -0.62 0.441 32.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.23
33 2018 1596 104.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1590 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1577 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1772 127.2 +0.40 -2.03 0.872 47.8% +8 — +18 41.8% -0.57 23–32 (42%) 38–34 (53%) 98.0 +1.31 — 1646 121.4 -2.49 -2.65 0.767 45.7% -111 +104 -65 29.1% -1.30 3–12 (20%) 11–11 (50%) 94.2 -1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.