H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Frank Dancevic vs Marcos Daniel H2H: 1-0
Frank Dancevic holds a 1–0 lead over Marcos Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Frank Dancevic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Frank Dancevic won the 2006 Tokyo second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 41
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2006* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Frank Dancevic | 6-4 6-4 | Marcos Daniel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frank Dancevic | #406 | #65 | 783 | 1,773 | 54 | 89 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marcos Daniel | #904 | #56 | 942 | 1,649 | 20 | 63 | 24.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Frank Dancevic | Marcos Daniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #434 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #143 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #151 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #94 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #165 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #165 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #87 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #87 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #363 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #904 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |