H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Frank Dancevic vs Marsel Ilhan H2H: 0-1

Marsel Ilhan holds a 1–0 lead over Frank Dancevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marsel Ilhan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marsel Ilhan won the 2011 US Open first round 6-3 6-2 1-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Frank Dancevic
CAN Age 41 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Marsel Ilhan
TUR Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marsel Ilhan #101 6-3 6-2 1-0 (ret.) Frank Dancevic #179 Match data Aug 31, 2011* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Frank Dancevic #406 #65 783 1,771 54 90 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marsel Ilhan #1,764 #77 657 1,754 20 54 27.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Frank Dancevic Marsel Ilhan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2002 1–2 33.3% — 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 0–1 0.0% #201 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 1–2 33.3% #171 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 2–6 25.0% #188 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2006 6–9 40.0% #88 1,557 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2007 16–18 47.1% #72 1,696 0 0 2009 2–3 40.0% #155 1,591 0 0
23 2008 6–11 35.3% #130 1,652 0 0 2010 4–8 33.3% #90 1,655 0 0
24 2009 9–11 45.0% #143 1,698 0 0 2011 5–13 27.8% #111 1,683 0 0
25 2010 2–3 40.0% #269 1,663 0 0 2012 0–3 0.0% #215 1,571 0 0
26 2011 2–6 25.0% #151 1,696 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2012 1–5 16.7% #165 1,604 0 0 2014 0–5 0.0% #104 1,635 0 0
28 2013 2–3 40.0% #122 1,687 0 0 2015 8–14 36.4% #114 1,703 0 0
29 2014 2–6 25.0% #149 1,654 0 0 2016 0–5 0.0% #246 1,570 0 0
30 2015 0–3 0.0% #209 1,601 0 0 2017 1–1 50.0% #324 1,576 0 0
31 2016 3–3 50.0% #241 1,663 0 0 2018 0–1 0.0% #543 1,559 0 0
32 2017 1–1 50.0% #363 1,658 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — 2021 0–1 0.0% #755 1,541 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Frank Dancevic Marsel Ilhan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2010 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2009 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 2 10 12 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2014 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2015 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2017 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 32 61 93 34.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 21 23 44 47.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — 11 31 42 26.2% 5 16 21 23.8% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 143/144 of Frank Dancevic's and 74/74 of Marsel Ilhan's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Frank Dancevic Marsel Ilhan
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2002 3/3 6.7 3.7 49.8% 68.8% 44.1% 52.2% 45.1% 56.5% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1/1 8.0 5.0 49.1% 73.1% 44.4% 69.2% 30.8% 58.5% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 3/3 3.0 3.0 63.1% 75.9% 37.7% 39.9% 14.3% 61.5% 29.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 8/8 6.1 2.3 57.1% 66.2% 48.8% 55.0% 26.3% 58.1% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 15/15 6.3 1.3 62.8% 70.9% 52.0% 60.1% 37.9% 64.0% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 34/34 12.4 2.5 60.2% 75.4% 52.3% 59.8% 38.5% 66.0% 34.1% 2009 5/5 5.6 1.4 68.6% 68.0% 49.3% 55.4% 36.1% 61.8% 29.9%
23 2008 16/17 9.4 2.1 61.3% 73.3% 51.1% 65.5% 37.9% 64.5% 32.8% 2010 12/12 7.4 1.8 62.9% 69.0% 53.0% 58.9% 43.1% 63.1% 36.7%
24 2009 20/20 7.5 1.6 60.8% 74.2% 54.4% 56.4% 38.6% 66.5% 31.5% 2011 18/18 7.3 2.6 61.2% 68.8% 47.4% 61.1% 46.7% 60.7% 33.1%
25 2010 5/5 8.4 2.8 56.2% 75.4% 49.5% 63.0% 34.7% 63.8% 32.3% 2012 3/3 3.0 1.3 67.6% 66.8% 54.6% 75.5% 19.4% 62.0% 32.7%
26 2011 8/8 10.5 3.1 58.6% 68.7% 50.2% 52.8% 27.1% 60.8% 29.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 6/6 4.7 2.8 55.1% 61.7% 41.1% 49.4% 45.8% 52.1% 20.7% 2014 5/5 5.2 1.0 60.6% 64.4% 58.4% 48.7% 17.9% 61.9% 26.7%
28 2013 5/5 9.6 2.8 62.4% 69.0% 48.7% 61.0% 40.8% 61.5% 35.4% 2015 22/22 6.1 2.1 60.5% 69.6% 47.3% 50.8% 27.2% 60.9% 31.8%
29 2014 8/8 7.1 3.9 58.2% 67.9% 46.4% 51.2% 34.5% 58.9% 29.1% 2016 5/5 2.6 2.4 55.5% 69.8% 37.4% 36.4% 31.1% 55.2% 30.3%
30 2015 3/3 5.3 3.0 59.3% 71.1% 43.1% 55.0% 33.3% 59.6% 28.3% 2017 2/2 8.5 2.5 46.5% 87.1% 52.2% 77.8% 33.3% 68.9% 38.0%
31 2016 6/6 6.3 1.7 62.1% 74.2% 56.7% 71.1% 24.7% 67.9% 30.5% 2018 1/1 2.0 0.0 71.8% 53.6% 36.4% 20.0% 0.0% 48.7% 23.4%
32 2017 2/2 5.0 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 44.3% 50.0% 22.2% 65.7% 26.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 1/1 1.0 1.0 80.0% 61.4% 27.3% 33.3% 50.0% 54.5% 32.7%
Career — 143/144 8.6 2.3 59.9% 72.1% 50.4% 58.3% 35.7% 63.4% 31.9% — 74/74 6.1 2.0 61.6% 68.9% 48.5% 54.9% 34.5% 60.9% 32.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Frank Dancevic Marsel Ilhan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2002 1506 104.6 +0.04 -3.24 0.682 44.0% +22 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1497 102.3 +2.47 -1.76 0.878 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1486 103.8 -0.52 -3.23 0.760 44.9% — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1473 101.3 -2.56 -1.42 0.825 46.8% +33 — — 27.8% -1.28 1–1 1–1 — +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 1558 120.1 +0.72 -1.24 0.948 48.9% -17 — +44 46.2% -0.31 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.23 2008 1476 99.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 1697 136.2 +2.37 -1.18 1.003 49.7% -6 — -95 48.4% -0.16 8–8 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.87 2009 1591 112.5 -2.06 -1.35 0.783 45.9% +40 — — 33.3% -1.00 2–0 1–1 — -0.13
23 2008 1653 126.4 +1.17 -2.13 0.925 49.7% -7 — +11 44.7% -0.34 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.19 2010 1656 121.4 +0.27 -0.03 0.995 50.2% -21 — — 42.9% -0.06 1–4 (20%) 0–2 — -0.21
24 2009 1699 134.9 +1.81 -2.41 0.940 48.8% +28 — +6 43.5% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.65 2011 1683 128.4 -2.01 -2.77 0.841 47.4% -15 -10 — 31.1% -1.09 1–4 (20%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.52
25 2010 1663 112.5 -0.81 -0.02 0.891 48.2% — — +83 50.0% -0.42 0–2 3–0 (100%) — -0.03 2012 1571 105.6 +0.17 -3.49 0.859 48.1% — — — 14.3% -1.29 0–1 0–1 — 0.00
26 2011 1696 122.6 -2.16 -3.36 0.759 45.7% +7 — — 36.4% -0.95 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.72 2013 1533 104.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 1605 113.3 -3.12 -6.61 0.432 37.6% +71 — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.47 2014 1635 114.5 -2.23 -3.69 0.701 45.2% — — — 8.3% -2.08 — 0–1 — +0.20
28 2013 1688 118.1 -0.19 -0.40 0.918 48.5% +6 — — 43.8% -0.44 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.09 2015 1704 133.7 -2.24 -2.38 0.812 46.6% -17 -22 -17 35.2% -1.09 2–2 (50%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.17
29 2014 1655 115.5 -2.84 -3.79 0.710 44.6% +4 — — 33.3% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12 2016 1571 102.1 -2.34 -2.75 0.677 42.9% +12 — — 8.3% -2.67 0–1 — — +0.09
30 2015 1602 110.2 -0.20 -3.32 0.701 44.7% +41 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.04 2017 1577 99.5 -0.22 -1.20 1.221 52.6% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.26
31 2016 1663 114.3 -0.72 -0.87 0.948 49.4% — — +100 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.11 2018 1560 93.5 -1.89 -4.09 0.456 34.9% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.11
32 2017 1658 105.5 -0.71 -1.04 0.776 46.9% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1596 104.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1590 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1541 97.7 -0.78 -2.35 0.719 43.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.30
35 2020 1577 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1772 127.2 +0.40 -2.03 0.872 47.8% +8 — +18 41.8% -0.57 23–32 (42%) 38–34 (53%) 98.0 +1.31 — 1754 121.8 -1.59 -2.17 0.830 47.0% -8 -18 -17 30.5% -1.10 6–13 (32%) 8–15 (35%) 92.4 -1.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.