H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Frank Dancevic vs Sam Groth

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Frank Dancevic vs Sam Groth.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Frank Dancevic
CAN Age 41 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Sam Groth
AUS Age 38 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Frank Dancevic #292 7-6(5) 6-3 Sam Groth #121 Match data Jun 19, 2016* Q2 Q Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass
Sam Groth #278 6-3 7-6(1) Frank Dancevic #130 Match data Jan 4, 2009 Q1 Q Brisbane International ATP 250 Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Frank Dancevic #406 #65 783 1,771 54 90 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sam Groth #1,155 #53 843 1,849 36 58 38.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Frank Dancevic Sam Groth
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2002 1–2 33.3% — 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 0–1 0.0% #201 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 1–2 33.3% #171 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 2–6 25.0% #188 1,472 0 0 2008 1–1 50.0% #278 1,556 0 0
21 2006 6–9 40.0% #88 1,557 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #279 1,548 0 0
22 2007 16–18 47.1% #72 1,696 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2008 6–11 35.3% #130 1,652 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2009 9–11 45.0% #143 1,698 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2010 2–3 40.0% #269 1,663 0 0 2013 1–3 25.0% #172 1,553 0 0
26 2011 2–6 25.0% #151 1,696 0 0 2014 9–13 40.9% #81 1,707 0 0
27 2012 1–5 16.7% #165 1,604 0 0 2015 18–21 46.2% #60 1,796 0 0
28 2013 2–3 40.0% #122 1,687 0 0 2016 4–15 21.1% #180 1,636 0 0
29 2014 2–6 25.0% #149 1,654 0 0 2017 2–3 40.0% #248 1,594 0 0
30 2015 0–3 0.0% #209 1,601 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2016 3–3 50.0% #241 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2017 1–1 50.0% #363 1,658 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Frank Dancevic Sam Groth
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2006 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2007 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 6 11 17 35.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
27 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2015 12 15 27 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
28 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2 11 13 15.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2014 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2015 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 32 61 93 34.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 21 23 44 47.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — 22 42 64 34.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 13 12 25 52.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 143/144 of Frank Dancevic's and 93/94 of Sam Groth's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Frank Dancevic Sam Groth
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2002 3/3 6.7 3.7 49.8% 68.8% 44.1% 52.2% 45.1% 56.5% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1/1 8.0 5.0 49.1% 73.1% 44.4% 69.2% 30.8% 58.5% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 3/3 3.0 3.0 63.1% 75.9% 37.7% 39.9% 14.3% 61.5% 29.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 8/8 6.1 2.3 57.1% 66.2% 48.8% 55.0% 26.3% 58.1% 34.5% 2008 2/2 19.0 6.0 54.6% 87.5% 56.2% 78.6% 37.5% 72.7% 33.2%
21 2006 15/15 6.3 1.3 62.8% 70.9% 52.0% 60.1% 37.9% 64.0% 34.1% 2009 3/3 10.3 8.3 49.4% 71.0% 48.2% 60.8% 100.0% 59.3% 28.8%
22 2007 34/34 12.4 2.5 60.2% 75.4% 52.3% 59.8% 38.5% 66.0% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 16/17 9.4 2.1 61.3% 73.3% 51.1% 65.5% 37.9% 64.5% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 20/20 7.5 1.6 60.8% 74.2% 54.4% 56.4% 38.6% 66.5% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 5/5 8.4 2.8 56.2% 75.4% 49.5% 63.0% 34.7% 63.8% 32.3% 2013 4/4 15.5 5.0 64.1% 72.9% 54.7% 64.2% 24.1% 65.9% 32.3%
26 2011 8/8 10.5 3.1 58.6% 68.7% 50.2% 52.8% 27.1% 60.8% 29.8% 2014 22/22 15.6 4.2 61.8% 81.6% 54.3% 67.8% 30.8% 71.1% 28.8%
27 2012 6/6 4.7 2.8 55.1% 61.7% 41.1% 49.4% 45.8% 52.1% 20.7% 2015 39/39 16.0 4.6 61.6% 78.8% 51.4% 66.5% 26.3% 68.1% 28.5%
28 2013 5/5 9.6 2.8 62.4% 69.0% 48.7% 61.0% 40.8% 61.5% 35.4% 2016 18/19 14.8 5.8 58.0% 77.3% 46.6% 63.5% 44.8% 64.2% 29.4%
29 2014 8/8 7.1 3.9 58.2% 67.9% 46.4% 51.2% 34.5% 58.9% 29.1% 2017 5/5 15.8 6.4 56.3% 79.2% 48.1% 67.4% 39.9% 65.9% 26.2%
30 2015 3/3 5.3 3.0 59.3% 71.1% 43.1% 55.0% 33.3% 59.6% 28.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 6/6 6.3 1.7 62.1% 74.2% 56.7% 71.1% 24.7% 67.9% 30.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 2/2 5.0 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 44.3% 50.0% 22.2% 65.7% 26.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 143/144 8.6 2.3 59.9% 72.1% 50.4% 58.3% 35.7% 63.4% 31.9% — 93/94 15.5 5.0 60.2% 78.9% 51.1% 66.3% 34.2% 67.6% 28.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Frank Dancevic Sam Groth
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2002 1506 104.6 +0.04 -3.24 0.682 44.0% +22 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1497 102.3 +2.47 -1.76 0.878 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1486 103.8 -0.52 -3.23 0.760 44.9% — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1473 101.3 -2.56 -1.42 0.825 46.8% +33 — — 27.8% -1.28 1–1 1–1 — +0.82 2008 1557 104.1 +1.47 -1.35 1.219 53.0% — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 2–0 — +0.15
21 2006 1558 120.1 +0.72 -1.24 0.948 48.9% -17 — +44 46.2% -0.31 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.23 2009 1548 110.5 -1.72 -0.48 0.708 45.0% — — — 33.3% -1.44 1–0 1–0 — +0.28
22 2007 1697 136.2 +2.37 -1.18 1.003 49.7% -6 — -95 48.4% -0.16 8–8 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.87 2010 1527 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 1653 126.4 +1.17 -2.13 0.925 49.7% -7 — +11 44.7% -0.34 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.19 2011 1493 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 1699 134.9 +1.81 -2.41 0.940 48.8% +28 — +6 43.5% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.65 2012 1479 100.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 1663 112.5 -0.81 -0.02 0.891 48.2% — — +83 50.0% -0.42 0–2 3–0 (100%) — -0.03 2013 1553 113.3 -1.09 +0.67 0.946 49.0% -20 — — 40.0% -0.60 0–2 2–0 — -0.22
26 2011 1696 122.6 -2.16 -3.36 0.759 45.7% +7 — — 36.4% -0.95 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.72 2014 1708 131.6 +4.20 -3.96 0.998 49.9% -73 — +91 41.8% -0.15 3–4 (43%) 11–13 (46%) — +0.17
27 2012 1605 113.3 -3.12 -6.61 0.432 37.6% +71 — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.47 2015 1797 142.6 +2.73 -5.23 0.895 48.7% -77 -215 +92 46.9% -0.37 6–8 (43%) 18–13 (58%) — -0.77
28 2013 1688 118.1 -0.19 -0.40 0.918 48.5% +6 — — 43.8% -0.44 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.09 2016 1636 125.3 +0.82 -4.85 0.819 47.1% -67 — +169 24.4% -1.29 0–2 2–11 (15%) — -1.24
29 2014 1655 115.5 -2.84 -3.79 0.710 44.6% +4 — — 33.3% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12 2017 1594 116.2 -0.83 -1.85 0.767 47.3% -41 — — 35.7% -0.86 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
30 2015 1602 110.2 -0.20 -3.32 0.701 44.7% +41 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.04 2018 1572 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 1663 114.3 -0.72 -0.87 0.948 49.4% — — +100 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 1658 105.5 -0.71 -1.04 0.776 46.9% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1596 104.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1590 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1577 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1772 127.2 +0.40 -2.03 0.872 47.8% +8 — +18 41.8% -0.57 23–32 (42%) 38–34 (53%) 98.0 +1.31 — 1849 129.9 +2.18 -4.18 0.894 48.6% -69 -215 +113 40.3% -0.56 12–17 (41%) 37–39 (49%) 98.2 -2.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.