H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Frank Dancevic vs Tim Smyczek

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Frank Dancevic vs Tim Smyczek.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Frank Dancevic
CAN Age 41 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Tim Smyczek
USA Age 38 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Smyczek #224 6-7(1) 6-2 6-2 Frank Dancevic #361 Match data Aug 7, 2017 Q2 Q Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tim Smyczek #176 6-3 7-6(4) Frank Dancevic #201 Match data Apr 5, 2011* Q3 Q U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship ATP 250 Clay
Frank Dancevic #88 6-1 6-4 Tim Smyczek #609 Match data Aug 28, 2006 Q1 Q US Open Grand Slam Hard

3 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Frank Dancevic #406 #65 783 1,771 54 90 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tim Smyczek #862 #68 688 1,768 43 85 33.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Frank Dancevic Tim Smyczek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2002 1–2 33.3% — 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 0–1 0.0% #201 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 1–2 33.3% #171 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 2–6 25.0% #188 1,472 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #349 1,491 0 0
21 2006 6–9 40.0% #88 1,557 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2007 16–18 47.1% #72 1,696 0 0 2010 1–4 20.0% #171 1,615 0 0
23 2008 6–11 35.3% #130 1,652 0 0 2011 3–6 33.3% #273 1,594 0 0
24 2009 9–11 45.0% #143 1,698 0 0 2012 3–6 33.3% #128 1,732 0 0
25 2010 2–3 40.0% #269 1,663 0 0 2013 8–11 42.1% #89 1,751 0 0
26 2011 2–6 25.0% #151 1,696 0 0 2014 7–12 36.8% #115 1,724 0 0
27 2012 1–5 16.7% #165 1,604 0 0 2015 5–13 27.8% #109 1,590 0 0
28 2013 2–3 40.0% #122 1,687 0 0 2016 8–10 44.4% #140 1,641 0 0
29 2014 2–6 25.0% #149 1,654 0 0 2017 1–7 12.5% #130 1,657 0 0
30 2015 0–3 0.0% #209 1,601 0 0 2018 6–12 33.3% #164 1,595 0 0
31 2016 3–3 50.0% #241 1,663 0 0 2019 1–3 25.0% #355 1,653 0 0
32 2017 1–1 50.0% #363 1,658 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Frank Dancevic Tim Smyczek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2009 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2012 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 7 10 17 41.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2015 4 7 11 36.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
28 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 6 9 15 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
29 2014 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2019 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2017 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 32 61 93 34.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 21 23 44 47.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — 34 64 98 34.7% 3 9 12 25.0% 6 12 18 33.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 143/144 of Frank Dancevic's and 128/128 of Tim Smyczek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Frank Dancevic Tim Smyczek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2002 3/3 6.7 3.7 49.8% 68.8% 44.1% 52.2% 45.1% 56.5% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1/1 8.0 5.0 49.1% 73.1% 44.4% 69.2% 30.8% 58.5% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 3/3 3.0 3.0 63.1% 75.9% 37.7% 39.9% 14.3% 61.5% 29.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 8/8 6.1 2.3 57.1% 66.2% 48.8% 55.0% 26.3% 58.1% 34.5% 2008 1/1 1.0 2.0 62.7% 52.4% 48.0% 66.7% 40.0% 50.7% 38.1%
21 2006 15/15 6.3 1.3 62.8% 70.9% 52.0% 60.1% 37.9% 64.0% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 34/34 12.4 2.5 60.2% 75.4% 52.3% 59.8% 38.5% 66.0% 34.1% 2010 5/5 2.2 2.4 63.2% 59.8% 52.4% 56.0% 60.9% 57.3% 36.3%
23 2008 16/17 9.4 2.1 61.3% 73.3% 51.1% 65.5% 37.9% 64.5% 32.8% 2011 9/9 1.9 2.3 62.1% 61.7% 52.5% 58.7% 35.2% 58.1% 37.5%
24 2009 20/20 7.5 1.6 60.8% 74.2% 54.4% 56.4% 38.6% 66.5% 31.5% 2012 9/9 4.2 2.7 59.3% 69.1% 49.5% 51.1% 45.2% 61.3% 35.7%
25 2010 5/5 8.4 2.8 56.2% 75.4% 49.5% 63.0% 34.7% 63.8% 32.3% 2013 19/19 5.9 2.4 63.5% 68.8% 53.2% 63.1% 38.8% 62.8% 38.3%
26 2011 8/8 10.5 3.1 58.6% 68.7% 50.2% 52.8% 27.1% 60.8% 29.8% 2014 19/19 4.2 3.0 63.1% 66.6% 48.3% 56.3% 39.5% 59.8% 35.4%
27 2012 6/6 4.7 2.8 55.1% 61.7% 41.1% 49.4% 45.8% 52.1% 20.7% 2015 18/18 3.4 2.6 61.9% 63.7% 50.6% 51.0% 39.1% 58.4% 32.8%
28 2013 5/5 9.6 2.8 62.4% 69.0% 48.7% 61.0% 40.8% 61.5% 35.4% 2016 18/18 5.6 2.7 61.5% 68.2% 49.5% 53.3% 41.3% 60.9% 36.4%
29 2014 8/8 7.1 3.9 58.2% 67.9% 46.4% 51.2% 34.5% 58.9% 29.1% 2017 8/8 4.8 2.1 57.1% 68.3% 48.9% 30.7% 27.7% 59.0% 33.4%
30 2015 3/3 5.3 3.0 59.3% 71.1% 43.1% 55.0% 33.3% 59.6% 28.3% 2018 18/18 5.4 3.3 62.0% 68.2% 47.8% 65.8% 34.4% 60.3% 35.7%
31 2016 6/6 6.3 1.7 62.1% 74.2% 56.7% 71.1% 24.7% 67.9% 30.5% 2019 4/4 3.3 2.3 59.5% 66.4% 53.4% 59.2% 26.8% 61.2% 30.6%
32 2017 2/2 5.0 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 44.3% 50.0% 22.2% 65.7% 26.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 143/144 8.6 2.3 59.9% 72.1% 50.4% 58.3% 35.7% 63.4% 31.9% — 128/128 4.5 2.7 61.8% 66.5% 50.2% 55.8% 38.7% 60.1% 35.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Frank Dancevic Tim Smyczek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2002 1506 104.6 +0.04 -3.24 0.682 44.0% +22 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — +0.04 2005 1481 95.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1497 102.3 +2.47 -1.76 0.878 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06 2006 1469 96.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1486 103.8 -0.52 -3.23 0.760 44.9% — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1473 101.3 -2.56 -1.42 0.825 46.8% +33 — — 27.8% -1.28 1–1 1–1 — +0.82 2008 1492 110.2 -1.24 +1.23 0.773 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.08
21 2006 1558 120.1 +0.72 -1.24 0.948 48.9% -17 — +44 46.2% -0.31 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.23 2009 1504 103.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 1697 136.2 +2.37 -1.18 1.003 49.7% -6 — -95 48.4% -0.16 8–8 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.87 2010 1615 126.2 -1.65 +0.34 0.851 47.3% +38 — — 25.0% -1.17 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.27
23 2008 1653 126.4 +1.17 -2.13 0.925 49.7% -7 — +11 44.7% -0.34 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.19 2011 1595 115.7 -1.87 -0.72 0.897 47.8% +35 — — 36.0% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 0–5 (0%) — +0.17
24 2009 1699 134.9 +1.81 -2.41 0.940 48.8% +28 — +6 43.5% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.65 2012 1732 133.0 -1.86 -0.04 0.924 48.5% +15 — -24 36.0% -0.80 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.71
25 2010 1663 112.5 -0.81 -0.02 0.891 48.2% — — +83 50.0% -0.42 0–2 3–0 (100%) — -0.03 2013 1751 131.8 -0.37 +1.79 1.029 50.3% +19 — — 47.3% -0.04 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.86
26 2011 1696 122.6 -2.16 -3.36 0.759 45.7% +7 — — 36.4% -0.95 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.72 2014 1725 132.7 -2.95 +0.13 0.882 48.1% +33 — — 36.2% -0.89 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.07
27 2012 1605 113.3 -3.12 -6.61 0.432 37.6% +71 — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.47 2015 1590 124.9 -3.58 -1.36 0.788 45.9% +94 -80 +19 30.4% -1.41 2–2 (50%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.13
28 2013 1688 118.1 -0.19 -0.40 0.918 48.5% +6 — — 43.8% -0.44 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.09 2016 1642 125.1 -2.11 +0.49 0.931 48.7% +36 -106 — 44.9% -0.49 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.03
29 2014 1655 115.5 -2.84 -3.79 0.710 44.6% +4 — — 33.3% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12 2017 1657 128.4 -2.19 -0.29 0.814 45.7% +53 — — 23.8% -1.43 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -0.98
30 2015 1602 110.2 -0.20 -3.32 0.701 44.7% +41 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.04 2018 1595 122.2 -2.94 -0.99 0.900 48.8% +5 — +87 38.3% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.02
31 2016 1663 114.3 -0.72 -0.87 0.948 49.4% — — +100 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.11 2019 1654 113.9 -3.13 -1.39 0.789 45.8% +13 — — 25.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.22
32 2017 1658 105.5 -0.71 -1.04 0.776 46.9% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1596 104.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1590 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1577 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1772 127.2 +0.40 -2.03 0.872 47.8% +8 — +18 41.8% -0.57 23–32 (42%) 38–34 (53%) 98.0 +1.31 — 1768 131.1 -2.28 -0.07 0.892 48.0% +36 -93 +40 37.1% -0.77 21–28 (43%) 18–34 (35%) 92.8 -0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.