H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Frew Mcmillan vs Ray Ruffels H2H: 1-2
Ray Ruffels holds a 2–1 lead over Frew Mcmillan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ray Ruffels leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Frew Mcmillan won the 1976 US Open second round 3-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 84
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 1976* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Frew Mcmillan | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
| May 15, 1970* | Brussels | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ray Ruffels | 6-4 6-3 | Frew Mcmillan | Match data |
| May 31, 1968* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Ray Ruffels | 5-7 7-5 6-4 8-6 | Frew Mcmillan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frew Mcmillan | #747 | #39 | 0 | 1,803 | 201 | 247 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ray Ruffels | #482 | #27 | 0 | 1,903 | 246 | 207 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Frew Mcmillan | Ray Ruffels | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 41–19 | 68.3% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 35–21 | 62.5% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 35–22 | 61.4% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 32–32 | 50.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1968 | 16–13 | 55.2% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1969 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,773 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1970 | 29–21 | 58.0% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #76 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1971 | 14–32 | 30.4% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #112 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1972 | 31–26 | 54.4% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,782 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1973 | 25–36 | 41.0% | #78 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,699 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1974 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #46 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1975 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #59 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,544 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 1976 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #482 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 1977 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #61 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1978 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #226 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #510 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |