H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Geoff Masters vs Ray Ruffels H2H: 1-1
Geoff Masters and Ray Ruffels are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Geoff Masters leads 1–0 on carpet, while Ray Ruffels leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ray Ruffels won the 1976 Manila semifinal 6-1 0-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 75
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 1976* | Manila | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Ray Ruffels | 6-1 0-6 6-4 | Geoff Masters | Match data |
| Sep 22, 1976* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Geoff Masters | 6-3 1-6 6-4 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geoff Masters | #826 | #41 | 0 | 1,881 | 238 | 255 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ray Ruffels | #482 | #27 | 0 | 1,903 | 246 | 207 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Geoff Masters | Ray Ruffels | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #52 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 41–19 | 68.3% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1974 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #53 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 35–21 | 62.5% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1975 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 35–22 | 61.4% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1976 | 27–31 | 46.6% | #53 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 32–32 | 50.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1977 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #78 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1978 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,773 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1979 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #62 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #76 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1980 | 13–28 | 31.7% | #166 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #112 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,499 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,782 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,699 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,544 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #482 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 |