H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
George Hardie vs Ray Ruffels H2H: 1-1
George Hardie and Ray Ruffels are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, George Hardie leads 1–0 on clay, while Ray Ruffels leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ray Ruffels won the 1977 Adelaide second round 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 73
Left-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 1977* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Ray Ruffels | 7-6 7-6 | George Hardie | Match data |
| Nov 25, 1976* | Bangalore | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | George Hardie | 6-3 4-2 (ret.) | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| George Hardie | #758 | #80 | 0 | 1,633 | 77 | 144 | 34.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ray Ruffels | #482 | #27 | 0 | 1,903 | 246 | 207 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | George Hardie | Ray Ruffels | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1972 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #168 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1974 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #166 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1975 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #107 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 41–19 | 68.3% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1976 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #179 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 35–21 | 62.5% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1977 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #116 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 35–22 | 61.4% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1978 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #153 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 32–32 | 50.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1979 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #120 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1980 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #146 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,773 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1981 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #146 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #76 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #112 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,782 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,699 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,544 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #482 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 |