H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Gilles Muller vs Adrian Menendez Maceiras.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilles Muller | 6-3 6-4 7-6(3) | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | Match data | Jun 24, 2014* | Q3 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilles Muller | #966 | #21 | 1,930 | 2,076 | 203 | 202 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Adrian Menendez Maceiras | — | — | — | 1,644 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Gilles Muller | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #69 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #105 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #95 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #248 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #54 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #368 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #47 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #34 | 1,968 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #25 | 1,943 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #138 | 1,689 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Gilles Muller | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2002 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2015 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2017 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2018 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | 18 | 41 | 56.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22 | 17 | 39 | 56.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 11 | 2 | 13 | 84.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 137 | 131 | 268 | 51.1% | 19 | 30 | 49 | 38.8% | 45 | 36 | 81 | 55.6% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | Career | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 397/405 of Gilles Muller's and 24/24 of Adrian Menendez Maceiras's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Gilles Muller | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2002 | 1/1 | 13.0 | 3.0 | 60.4% | 77.6% | 38.6% | 70.0% | 25.0% | 62.2% | 34.3% | 2012 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 57.6% | 61.4% | 45.2% | 50.0% | 20.0% | 54.5% | 27.3% |
| 2003 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 49.2% | 56.7% | 67.7% | 33.3% | 25.0% | 62.3% | 40.3% | 2013 | 2/2 | 6.0 | 2.5 | 62.0% | 54.0% | 41.9% | 54.2% | 25.0% | 49.3% | 25.7% |
| 2004 | 18/18 | 8.2 | 3.0 | 61.1% | 70.3% | 53.4% | 48.8% | 53.1% | 63.5% | 36.9% | 2015 | 5/5 | 6.0 | 3.2 | 58.6% | 68.8% | 51.3% | 57.4% | 54.9% | 61.5% | 30.9% |
| 2005 | 41/41 | 9.2 | 3.6 | 60.8% | 73.4% | 50.7% | 64.0% | 42.8% | 64.5% | 31.5% | 2017 | 6/6 | 5.0 | 1.7 | 61.5% | 69.1% | 47.8% | 48.6% | 38.5% | 61.8% | 33.5% |
| 2006 | 31/31 | 9.1 | 3.8 | 61.0% | 72.5% | 48.9% | 64.2% | 32.8% | 63.0% | 32.9% | 2018 | 6/6 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 63.8% | 65.7% | 46.2% | 56.4% | 40.0% | 58.1% | 33.1% |
| 2007 | 5/5 | 15.6 | 3.6 | 66.8% | 72.1% | 50.4% | 56.1% | 41.8% | 64.9% | 33.6% | 2019 | 4/4 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 58.7% | 62.7% | 45.2% | 43.3% | 45.9% | 55.4% | 32.5% |
| 2008 | 11/11 | 19.4 | 4.0 | 61.7% | 77.1% | 48.6% | 69.2% | 32.8% | 66.0% | 28.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 13/14 | 12.3 | 3.5 | 60.5% | 74.5% | 51.2% | 57.7% | 29.7% | 65.5% | 30.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 4/4 | 17.3 | 3.3 | 64.5% | 81.3% | 58.3% | 50.0% | 16.8% | 72.8% | 26.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 25/25 | 15.5 | 3.1 | 60.2% | 80.0% | 49.9% | 63.1% | 42.9% | 68.4% | 29.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 40/42 | 13.5 | 3.1 | 62.1% | 81.2% | 47.5% | 64.0% | 36.9% | 68.6% | 30.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 10/10 | 11.2 | 3.5 | 59.1% | 73.6% | 45.8% | 58.0% | 33.2% | 62.3% | 27.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 10/10 | 16.8 | 4.0 | 62.0% | 76.4% | 49.0% | 49.3% | 24.9% | 66.4% | 28.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 55/55 | 13.9 | 3.7 | 60.6% | 79.6% | 50.8% | 69.0% | 39.4% | 68.4% | 32.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 56/59 | 15.3 | 3.6 | 60.8% | 82.1% | 53.2% | 61.4% | 37.0% | 70.6% | 32.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 48/50 | 14.7 | 3.9 | 63.0% | 80.1% | 52.7% | 70.9% | 43.0% | 69.6% | 32.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 28/28 | 15.0 | 4.8 | 61.4% | 78.3% | 47.3% | 58.5% | 28.4% | 66.2% | 31.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Gilles Muller | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2002 | 1488 | 100.0 | -3.28 | -2.21 | 0.908 | 49.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.06 | 2007 | 1472 | 97.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 1451 | 96.0 | +2.20 | -4.69 | 1.068 | 50.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | 2008 | 1448 | 96.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 1600 | 126.5 | +0.44 | -0.24 | 1.013 | 50.1% | +38 | — | — | 44.2% | -0.09 | 7–1 (88%) | 1–6 (14%) | 105.2 | +0.52 | 2009 | 1427 | 100.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1728 | 137.8 | +2.01 | -3.76 | 0.888 | 48.6% | -9 | -178 | -152 | 44.8% | -0.60 | 6–5 (55%) | 13–6 (68%) | 107.5 | -2.15 | 2010 | 1407 | 101.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 1535 | 118.4 | -0.34 | -3.26 | 0.890 | 48.8% | +78 | -6 | -43 | 36.1% | -0.67 | 1–4 (20%) | 5–9 (36%) | 92.3 | +1.32 | 2011 | 1425 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 1578 | 104.7 | +1.65 | -2.99 | 0.958 | 49.5% | -32 | — | — | 30.8% | -0.77 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.07 | 2012 | 1499 | 98.1 | -0.33 | -2.29 | 0.600 | 41.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.01 |
| 2008 | 1673 | 122.4 | +2.48 | -2.87 | 0.833 | 48.5% | +20 | — | — | 45.7% | -0.34 | 2–2 (50%) | 6–4 (60%) | 103.7 | +0.16 | 2013 | 1574 | 109.6 | -2.38 | -2.31 | 0.508 | 38.5% | — | — | — | 16.7% | -3.17 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.10 |
| 2009 | 1632 | 120.3 | +1.24 | -3.51 | 0.868 | 48.1% | +68 | — | -102 | 40.0% | -0.63 | 1–2 (33%) | 5–2 (71%) | 101.7 | +0.29 | 2014 | 1563 | 107.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1610 | 114.3 | -1.03 | -2.96 | 0.979 | 49.2% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.10 | 1–1 | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.27 | 2015 | 1610 | 113.9 | -2.56 | -4.46 | 0.803 | 46.7% | -2 | — | — | 35.7% | -1.07 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.22 |
| 2011 | 1798 | 145.1 | +4.00 | -3.93 | 0.931 | 49.6% | 0 | — | -131 | 55.4% | -0.09 | 2–5 (29%) | 16–11 (59%) | 101.5 | -0.32 | 2016 | 1588 | 109.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 1840 | 148.8 | +4.06 | -4.34 | 0.979 | 49.8% | +31 | -246 | -188 | 46.8% | -0.15 | 10–7 (59%) | 16–17 (48%) | 102.7 | -1.66 | 2017 | 1607 | 112.5 | -1.85 | -1.76 | 0.877 | 47.9% | +51 | — | — | 43.8% | -0.69 | 0–2 | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.66 |
| 2013 | 1678 | 116.7 | +0.08 | -5.24 | 0.738 | 45.9% | +82 | -165 | — | 26.1% | -1.22 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.0 | -0.20 | 2018 | 1604 | 116.5 | -2.99 | -1.63 | 0.789 | 46.5% | +59 | — | — | 40.0% | -1.33 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.4 | +0.09 |
| 2014 | 1738 | 140.5 | +1.86 | -1.97 | 0.832 | 47.2% | +17 | — | — | 44.4% | -0.71 | 1–2 (33%) | 5–3 (63%) | 101.0 | -0.77 | 2019 | 1598 | 111.3 | -3.29 | -1.62 | 0.729 | 44.2% | — | — | — | 30.0% | -1.10 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.06 |
| 2015 | 1894 | 162.5 | +4.09 | -2.33 | 1.019 | 50.8% | -10 | -311 | -37 | 53.9% | +0.26 | 11–8 (58%) | 27–18 (60%) | 107.4 | -1.33 | 2020 | 1584 | 101.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 1968 | 159.7 | +6.13 | -2.52 | 1.108 | 51.4% | -18 | — | -20 | 55.2% | +0.31 | 10–8 (56%) | 24–21 (53%) | 101.5 | -1.98 | 2021 | 1558 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 1943 | 156.0 | +4.71 | -2.01 | 1.074 | 51.2% | -84 | -284 | +133 | 59.7% | +0.47 | 9–4 (69%) | 19–10 (66%) | 107.2 | -0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 1689 | 131.0 | +1.83 | -3.86 | 0.921 | 48.7% | +16 | -65 | +271 | 39.0% | -0.55 | 3–6 (33%) | 9–10 (47%) | 92.5 | +1.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2076 | 149.8 | +3.16 | -2.99 | 0.969 | 49.8% | +3 | -180 | -5 | 48.3% | -0.13 | 65–58 (53%) | 152–124 (55%) | 106.3 | -1.18 | Career | 1645 | 111.3 | -2.50 | -2.33 | 0.764 | 45.6% | +38 | — | — | 34.4% | -1.33 | 3–8 (27%) | 9–7 (56%) | 98.7 | +3.83 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Youzhny | 4 | 3 | 7 | Mar 24, 2018 | H2H |
| Andreas Seppi | 4 | 2 | 6 | Feb 9, 2018 | H2H |
| John Isner | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 29, 2017 | H2H |
| Rafael Nadal | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 11, 2017 | H2H |
| Roberto Bautista Agut | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 11, 2017 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Chardy | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 7, 2019 | — |
| Taro Daniel | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 12, 2019 | — |
| Fernando Verdasco | 1 | 0 | 1 | Apr 11, 2019 | — |
| Christopher Eubanks | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 14, 2019 | — |
| Denis Shapovalov | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 20, 2018 | — |