H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Gilles Simon vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 1-1

Gilles Simon and Daniel Gimeno-Traver are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on clay, while Gilles Simon leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2015 Tiriac Open quarterfinal 6-7(5) 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gilles Simon
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #68 6-7(5) 6-4 6-2 Gilles Simon #13 Match data Apr 25, 2015* QF Tiriac Open ATP 250 Clay
Gilles Simon #9 6-4 7-6(3) 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #101 Match data Sep 2, 2009* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gilles Simon #464 #6 4,170 2,092 499 383 56.6% 0 0 0 1 13 14
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilles Simon Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 2004 0–1 0.0% #177 1,460 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2005 6–6 50.0% #124 1,540 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2006 24–24 50.0% #45 1,633 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2007 35–26 57.4% #29 1,783 0 2 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2008 52–27 65.8% #7 1,983 0 5 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2009 45–24 65.2% #15 1,939 0 6 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2010 22–17 56.4% #41 1,928 0 7 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2011 38–25 60.3% #12 1,906 0 9 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2012 43–24 64.2% #16 1,950 0 10 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2013 36–22 62.1% #19 1,925 0 11 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2014 28–25 52.8% #21 1,946 0 11 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2015 41–22 65.1% #15 1,989 0 12 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 2016 32–26 55.2% #25 1,945 0 12 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 2017 15–25 37.5% #89 1,767 0 12 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0
33 2018 33–24 57.9% #30 1,869 0 14 — — — — — — —
34 2019 27–28 49.1% #55 1,776 0 14 — — — — — — —
35 2020 10–12 45.5% #63 1,755 0 14 — — — — — — —
36 2021 5–17 22.7% #122 1,624 0 14 — — — — — — —
37 2022 7–8 46.7% #143 1,703 0 14 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gilles Simon Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2005 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
21 2006 7 9 16 43.8% 15 10 25 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 14 11 25 56.0% 18 10 28 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2008 32 18 50 64.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2009 34 15 49 69.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2010 17 13 30 56.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2011 22 16 38 57.9% 14 7 21 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2012 22 12 34 64.7% 18 9 27 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 2013 23 14 37 62.2% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2014 17 14 31 54.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 2015 25 15 40 62.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2016 22 17 39 56.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2017 9 13 22 40.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2018 19 13 32 59.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 14 18 32 43.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 10 10 20 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 297 224 521 57.0% 146 112 258 56.6% 52 42 94 55.3% 4 5 9 44.4% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 866/882 of Gilles Simon's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gilles Simon Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 2004 1/1 5.0 1.0 69.7% 64.5% 55.6% 50.0% 100.0% 61.8% 38.0% 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 2005 12/12 3.5 1.8 54.6% 66.1% 51.5% 51.7% 45.2% 59.6% 38.6% 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2006 48/48 4.0 1.6 54.9% 67.0% 50.5% 50.9% 41.9% 59.4% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 61/61 3.7 1.8 56.8% 66.3% 49.4% 57.1% 50.7% 59.1% 40.4% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2008 75/79 4.5 2.1 57.5% 69.6% 53.7% 57.5% 39.4% 62.8% 39.4% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2009 69/69 6.1 2.1 55.0% 74.4% 54.7% 66.1% 46.9% 65.6% 39.4% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2010 38/39 6.1 2.5 55.7% 75.1% 53.0% 61.3% 36.9% 65.4% 36.8% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2011 63/63 4.7 2.5 56.0% 69.4% 50.9% 52.0% 46.6% 61.3% 40.9% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2012 63/67 4.0 2.0 55.9% 69.9% 52.9% 57.5% 41.4% 62.3% 40.5% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2013 58/58 4.1 2.5 56.8% 69.0% 49.7% 59.2% 41.8% 60.6% 39.1% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2014 52/53 5.8 2.5 55.8% 71.4% 50.8% 63.3% 43.7% 62.7% 40.0% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2015 63/63 3.6 2.4 58.3% 68.7% 52.6% 53.5% 50.8% 62.1% 40.9% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 2016 55/58 3.3 2.6 57.9% 67.1% 52.5% 57.3% 45.0% 60.7% 40.1% 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 2017 40/40 2.9 2.6 55.0% 67.7% 51.1% 55.2% 44.6% 60.4% 37.9% 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
33 2018 56/57 4.4 2.2 60.5% 70.8% 50.8% 56.2% 44.5% 62.9% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 54/55 3.9 2.6 62.1% 68.3% 49.8% 61.7% 42.1% 61.6% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 22/22 4.4 3.0 55.1% 70.4% 50.2% 53.1% 48.8% 61.8% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 21/22 2.3 4.2 60.6% 66.3% 44.6% 45.0% 48.5% 57.5% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 15/15 2.9 2.2 61.4% 65.3% 48.5% 54.8% 40.7% 58.5% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 866/882 4.3 2.3 57.2% 69.4% 51.4% 57.2% 44.5% 61.8% 39.6% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gilles Simon Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 2004 1460 98.1 -0.26 -0.85 0.994 50.6% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.17 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2005 1540 122.5 -2.20 +0.53 0.954 48.7% -20 +36 — 42.4% -0.36 6–1 (86%) 0–4 (0%) 106.2 +0.22 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2006 1633 131.6 -2.73 +1.62 0.960 49.1% -36 +38 -42 46.2% -0.23 12–4 (75%) 5–9 (36%) 108.4 -0.30 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 1784 140.3 -2.50 +3.16 0.988 50.0% -97 +67 -200 50.7% +0.01 14–6 (70%) 10–9 (53%) 111.1 -1.35 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20
23 2008 1984 156.8 +0.08 +3.37 1.060 51.1% -7 -90 -295 59.8% +0.54 21–9 (70%) 17–9 (65%) 113.7 +0.42 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24
24 2009 1940 155.0 +1.89 +2.48 1.145 52.4% +57 -140 -158 62.4% +0.88 13–10 (57%) 16–10 (62%) 102.3 +4.99 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95
25 2010 1928 152.1 +2.01 +0.87 1.063 50.8% +47 -166 -126 50.0% +0.16 11–3 (79%) 6–7 (46%) 103.4 -0.07 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72
26 2011 1907 159.5 -0.73 +3.87 1.055 51.0% -11 +50 -96 58.9% +0.64 12–12 (50%) 11–15 (42%) 95.5 +0.18 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11
27 2012 1950 157.5 -0.02 +3.35 1.075 51.2% +13 +23 -123 59.0% +0.54 11–10 (52%) 9–13 (41%) 95.5 +3.21 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22
28 2013 1925 156.5 -2.02 +2.35 0.991 50.1% +20 +80 -82 57.2% +0.14 11–6 (65%) 16–8 (67%) 107.6 +1.94 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44
29 2014 1947 160.4 -0.47 +3.65 1.071 51.4% +27 -53 -64 51.9% +0.42 9–9 (50%) 9–12 (43%) 98.9 +1.84 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04
30 2015 1990 161.4 -1.32 +4.77 1.080 51.5% -18 -44 +40 60.4% +0.66 15–8 (65%) 12–13 (48%) 100.8 +1.25 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22
31 2016 1945 160.5 -1.63 +3.73 1.020 50.5% +22 -37 +11 53.5% +0.21 13–10 (57%) 13–11 (54%) 103.4 +1.19 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 2017 1767 147.6 -2.41 +2.04 0.958 49.2% +68 +9 +71 41.3% -0.41 7–7 (50%) 5–10 (33%) 94.8 -1.50 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 2018 1870 151.0 -0.74 +4.77 1.113 51.8% -5 -66 -8 59.4% +0.68 6–8 (43%) 21–16 (57%) 99.3 +0.92 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1777 145.4 -2.46 +2.32 1.015 49.9% +15 -28 +102 50.4% +0.06 12–7 (63%) 10–15 (40%) 99.2 +2.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1756 144.5 -1.00 +2.76 1.058 50.9% +43 — — 48.2% +0.12 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.4 -1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1625 120.8 -3.59 -1.65 0.820 46.4% +88 -27 +101 30.4% -1.23 2–6 (25%) 1–5 (17%) 90.0 -1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 1704 125.3 -2.58 +1.62 0.879 47.7% +12 -42 — 44.4% -0.72 4–0 (100%) 3–1 (75%) 109.4 -0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2092 157.4 -1.00 +2.94 1.034 50.6% +11 -7 -45 54.1% +0.28 181–120 (60%) 168–170 (50%) 105.5 +1.37 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.