H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Gilles Simon vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 4-4

Gilles Simon and Jeremy Chardy are tied 4–4 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Jeremy Chardy leads 4–2 on hard courts, while Gilles Simon leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2021 Murray River Open third round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gilles Simon
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 4
8 main draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 4, 2021* Murray River Open ATP 250 R32 Hard Jeremy Chardy #66 6-3 6-4 Gilles Simon #64 Match data
Jan 15, 2020* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Jeremy Chardy #56 6-3 7-5 Gilles Simon #60 Match data
Mar 23, 2019* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jeremy Chardy #40 6-4 6-2 Gilles Simon #27 Match data
Nov 1, 2017* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jeremy Chardy #88 6-3 6-0 Gilles Simon #74 Match data
Feb 21, 2015* Marseille ATP 250 QF Hard Gilles Simon #17 7-5 7-6(6) Jeremy Chardy #35 Match data
Feb 13, 2015* Rotterdam ATP 500 R16 Hard Gilles Simon #19 6-4 6-3 Jeremy Chardy #34 Match data
May 8, 2013* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Gilles Simon #17 6-4 7-6(5) Jeremy Chardy #29 Match data
May 26, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Gilles Simon #18 4-6 6-4 6-1 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #61 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gilles Simon #464 #6 4,170 2,093 493 379 56.5% 0 0 0 1 13 14
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,968 290 303 48.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilles Simon Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2004 0–1 0.0% #177 1,460 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,547 0 0
20 2005 6–6 50.0% #124 1,540 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2006 24–24 50.0% #45 1,633 0 0 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,680 0 0
22 2007 35–26 57.4% #29 1,783 0 2 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,780 0 1
23 2008 50–26 65.8% #7 1,981 0 5 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,827 0 1
24 2009 45–24 65.2% #15 1,936 0 6 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,728 0 1
25 2010 22–17 56.4% #41 1,930 0 7 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,822 0 1
26 2011 38–25 60.3% #12 1,905 0 9 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,797 0 1
27 2012 41–23 64.1% #16 1,959 0 10 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2013 36–22 62.1% #19 1,926 0 11 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,896 0 1
29 2014 28–25 52.8% #21 1,953 0 11 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2015 41–22 65.1% #15 1,990 0 12 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,784 0 1
31 2016 30–25 54.5% #25 1,937 0 12 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2017 15–25 37.5% #89 1,764 0 12 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,918 0 1
33 2018 33–24 57.9% #30 1,861 0 14 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 2019 27–28 49.1% #55 1,773 0 14 2021 17–17 50.0% #107 1,774 0 1
35 2020 10–12 45.5% #63 1,754 0 14 — — — — — — —
36 2021 5–16 23.8% #122 1,634 0 14 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,718 0 1
37 2022 7–8 46.7% #143 1,707 0 14 — — — — — — —