H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Gilles Simon vs Milos Raonic H2H: 1-5

Milos Raonic holds a 5–1 lead over Gilles Simon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2018 US Open second round 6-3 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gilles Simon
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
Milos Raonic
CAN Age 35 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 30, 2018* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Milos Raonic #24 6-3 6-4 6-4 Gilles Simon #40 Match data
Jan 22, 2017* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Milos Raonic #3 6-2 7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 Gilles Simon #25 Match data
Jun 20, 2015* Queen's Club ATP 500 QF Grass Gilles Simon #13 4-6 6-3 7-5 Milos Raonic #8 Match data
Oct 4, 2014* Tokyo ATP 500 SF Hard Milos Raonic #8 6-1 6-4 Gilles Simon #37 Match data
Jun 1, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Milos Raonic #9 4-6 6-3 2-6 6-2 7-5 Gilles Simon #30 Match data
Apr 30, 2011* Estoril ATP 250 QF Clay Milos Raonic #27 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 Gilles Simon #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gilles Simon #464 #6 4,170 2,093 493 379 56.5% 0 0 0 1 13 14
Milos Raonic #634 #3 5,450 2,246 369 186 66.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gilles Simon Milos Raonic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #373 1,535 0 0
19 2004 0–1 0.0% #177 1,460 0 0 2010 3–4 42.9% #156 1,651 0 0
20 2005 6–6 50.0% #124 1,540 0 0 2011 30–18 62.5% #31 1,839 0 1
21 2006 24–24 50.0% #45 1,633 0 0 2012 42–20 67.7% #13 1,987 0 3
22 2007 35–26 57.4% #29 1,783 0 2 2013 41–21 66.1% #11 2,034 0 5
23 2008 50–26 65.8% #7 1,981 0 5 2014 47–20 70.1% #8 2,087 0 6
24 2009 45–24 65.2% #15 1,936 0 6 2015 32–15 68.1% #14 2,047 0 7
25 2010 22–17 56.4% #41 1,930 0 7 2016 52–19 73.2% #3 2,143 0 8
26 2011 38–25 60.3% #12 1,905 0 9 2017 29–14 67.4% #24 2,053 0 8
27 2012 41–23 64.1% #16 1,959 0 10 2018 31–18 63.3% #18 1,952 0 8
28 2013 36–22 62.1% #19 1,926 0 11 2019 23–13 63.9% #31 1,919 0 8
29 2014 28–25 52.8% #21 1,953 0 11 2020 23–10 69.7% #14 1,996 0 8
30 2015 41–22 65.1% #15 1,990 0 12 2021 6–4 60.0% #70 1,964 0 8
31 2016 30–25 54.5% #25 1,937 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 2017 15–25 37.5% #89 1,764 0 12 2023 4–4 50.0% #317 1,909 0 8
33 2018 33–24 57.9% #30 1,861 0 14 2024 6–5 54.5% #238 1,903 0 8
34 2019 27–28 49.1% #55 1,773 0 14 — — — — — — —
35 2020 10–12 45.5% #63 1,754 0 14 — — — — — — —
36 2021 5–16 23.8% #122 1,634 0 14 — — — — — — —
37 2022 7–8 46.7% #143 1,707 0 14 — — — — — — —