H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Go Soeda vs Martin Fischer H2H: 0-1

Martin Fischer holds a 1–0 lead over Go Soeda in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martin Fischer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Martin Fischer won the 2010 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Go Soeda
JPN Age 41 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Martin Fischer
AUT Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martin Fischer #174 6-4 7-6(10) Go Soeda #109 Match data Jun 23, 2014 Q1 Q Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Martin Fischer #164 6-4 6-3 6-1 Go Soeda #124 Match data Jun 23, 2010* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Go Soeda #683 #47 888 1,709 29 78 27.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Martin Fischer #1,005 #117 467 1,683 2 19 9.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Go Soeda Martin Fischer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% #438 1,497 0 0
20 2005 0–2 0.0% #302 1,484 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #264 1,471 0 0
21 2006 0–2 0.0% #188 1,462 0 0 2008 0–3 0.0% #216 1,518 0 0
22 2007 0–3 0.0% #206 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2008 1–3 25.0% #114 1,478 0 0 2010 1–3 25.0% #133 1,612 0 0
24 2009 0–3 0.0% #238 1,498 0 0 2011 0–4 0.0% #219 1,612 0 0
25 2010 1–4 20.0% #120 1,474 0 0 2012 1–3 25.0% #299 1,637 0 0
26 2011 3–7 30.0% #120 1,566 0 0 2013 0–3 0.0% #192 1,643 0 0
27 2012 10–17 37.0% #60 1,631 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2013 6–15 28.6% #103 1,701 0 0 2015 0–1 0.0% #705 1,626 0 0
29 2014 1–3 25.0% #99 1,581 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2015 6–12 33.3% #132 1,653 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2016 0–1 0.0% #126 1,644 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2017 0–3 0.0% #150 1,603 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2019 1–1 50.0% #121 1,594 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2020 0–2 0.0% #133 1,585 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Go Soeda Martin Fischer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2007 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2009 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2012 8 10 18 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 5 12 17 29.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2014 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 24 58 82 29.3% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 12 16 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 0 6 6 0.0% 1 10 11 9.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 106/107 of Go Soeda's and 21/21 of Martin Fischer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Go Soeda Martin Fischer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/1 0.0 1.0 66.7% 54.3% 47.8% 50.0% 33.3% 52.2% 32.4%
20 2005 2/2 5.0 4.0 57.5% 63.4% 54.6% 47.2% 71.4% 59.6% 29.6% 2007 1/1 1.0 4.0 48.4% 60.9% 51.0% 37.5% 30.0% 55.8% 36.6%
21 2006 2/2 1.5 3.5 51.2% 59.3% 43.3% 51.4% 50.0% 50.9% 27.5% 2008 3/3 3.7 1.0 60.9% 54.6% 52.9% 46.3% 75.0% 53.5% 35.1%
22 2007 3/3 2.3 2.3 58.2% 66.5% 47.4% 45.5% 27.8% 58.6% 27.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 4/4 2.5 1.8 59.6% 70.7% 42.3% 54.2% 35.8% 59.5% 35.3% 2010 4/4 5.3 3.5 55.9% 71.1% 50.4% 46.6% 41.3% 61.7% 36.3%
24 2009 3/3 1.3 4.3 58.7% 62.1% 39.3% 48.4% 71.4% 52.5% 29.3% 2011 4/4 2.5 1.8 66.6% 59.4% 44.8% 52.2% 39.6% 54.7% 32.1%
25 2010 5/5 3.2 3.4 52.7% 66.1% 48.6% 62.2% 20.2% 57.8% 34.4% 2012 4/4 2.0 3.3 50.2% 63.8% 55.6% 57.7% 56.2% 59.7% 40.3%
26 2011 10/10 2.5 3.3 51.9% 61.1% 48.1% 53.8% 24.1% 54.6% 31.3% 2013 3/3 2.0 2.0 59.2% 53.8% 46.1% 33.9% 36.1% 50.4% 41.0%
27 2012 26/27 3.1 2.7 52.6% 67.5% 49.8% 46.3% 43.3% 59.1% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 21/21 3.8 2.9 56.6% 68.8% 46.3% 48.9% 42.5% 59.2% 32.3% 2015 1/1 2.0 4.0 53.3% 63.2% 52.0% 75.0% 50.0% 57.9% 36.6%
29 2014 4/4 2.3 2.5 60.1% 65.9% 38.4% 49.5% 33.3% 54.8% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 18/18 2.3 2.1 57.2% 68.7% 47.8% 53.8% 25.3% 59.9% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 1/1 4.0 1.0 63.2% 73.3% 48.6% 55.6% 16.7% 64.2% 30.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 3/3 2.7 1.0 56.6% 63.5% 48.8% 41.3% 55.0% 56.9% 28.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 2/2 5.0 2.5 54.0% 72.6% 48.7% 70.8% 37.5% 61.4% 27.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 2/2 3.5 3.0 60.6% 62.2% 58.5% 47.8% 12.5% 60.8% 22.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Go Soeda Martin Fischer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1497 108.9 -0.21 +4.23 0.676 42.3% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.16
20 2005 1485 101.8 -0.40 -1.85 0.733 46.5% — — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 1–0 — -0.24 2007 1472 97.7 -0.75 -2.03 0.829 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — 0.00
21 2006 1463 107.8 -1.06 +0.75 0.560 39.6% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.25 2008 1519 108.0 -0.10 -0.96 0.756 44.8% — — — 0.0% -2.33 — 0–2 — +0.23
22 2007 1488 103.9 -0.94 -1.36 0.668 44.0% +11 — — 12.5% -2.25 0–1 — — -0.32 2009 1495 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 1478 108.0 -1.73 +0.50 0.872 48.4% +13 — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.03 2010 1612 112.3 -0.88 -1.58 0.948 49.1% — — — 42.9% 0.00 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.26
24 2009 1499 109.9 -3.20 -0.53 0.617 42.3% +9 — — 14.3% -2.29 0–1 — — +0.01 2011 1613 111.8 -4.94 -2.70 0.708 43.3% — — — 18.2% -1.91 0–2 1–1 — +0.67
25 2010 1474 106.1 -1.99 -0.82 0.815 46.4% — — +51 16.7% -2.08 1–0 0–1 — +0.18 2012 1637 118.4 -1.00 -0.19 0.998 50.7% — +37 — 40.0% -0.10 0–2 0–2 — +0.07
26 2011 1567 116.3 -3.91 -2.57 0.689 43.7% 0 — — 26.9% -2.08 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.17 2013 1644 121.1 -3.84 -0.12 0.827 45.3% — — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 — — -0.11
27 2012 1631 134.7 -2.57 +0.96 0.928 48.5% +24 — -97 39.4% -0.42 3–4 (43%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.30 2014 1599 113.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 1701 130.6 -3.36 -2.47 0.791 46.1% +14 — — 30.9% -1.27 3–2 (60%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.77 2015 1627 107.5 +0.68 -3.25 0.870 48.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.01
29 2014 1581 111.3 -0.66 +0.64 0.926 48.3% +29 — — 22.2% -1.44 — 0–1 — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 1653 131.9 -2.99 -1.11 0.813 46.3% -4 -213 — 32.6% -1.26 3–2 (60%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 1645 110.7 +1.28 +0.72 0.860 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 1604 109.6 -1.95 -3.50 0.662 44.4% +17 — — 0.0% -2.14 — 0–2 — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1554 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1594 128.8 +2.61 +3.04 0.709 45.8% — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 1–0 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1586 113.3 -0.77 +0.65 0.578 42.8% — — — 16.7% -2.34 0–1 1–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1510 95.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 1452 94.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1709 124.4 -2.51 -0.78 0.803 46.3% +12 -213 -53 29.7% -1.30 13–16 (45%) 17–22 (44%) 99.8 -0.47 — 1684 117.0 -1.88 -1.06 0.837 46.7% — +37 — 26.8% -1.09 0–8 (0%) 3–9 (25%) 87.6 +4.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.