H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Goran Ivanisevic vs Ronald Agenor H2H: 1-0
Goran Ivanisevic holds a 1–0 lead over Ronald Agenor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Goran Ivanisevic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Goran Ivanisevic won the 1994 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-4 6-7(0) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 54
Left-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
HAI
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 1994* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Goran Ivanisevic | 6-4 6-7(0) 7-5 | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goran Ivanisevic | #395 | #2 | 3,572 | 2,124 | 561 | 316 | 64.0% | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 22 |
| Ronald Agenor | #1,507 | #22 | 984 | 1,895 | 215 | 251 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Goran Ivanisevic | Ronald Agenor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #371 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #40 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,921 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 57–18 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,090 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #49 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 9 | 1986 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 62–26 | 70.5% | #5 | 1,976 | 0 | 11 | 1987 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,911 | 0 | 12 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #28 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 76–24 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,001 | 0 | 17 | 1989 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #37 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 20 | 1990 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #29 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1998 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #12 | 1,873 | 0 | 21 | 1991 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #74 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1999 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,713 | 0 | 21 | 1992 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #132 | 1,538 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2000 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #129 | 1,596 | 0 | 21 | 1993 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #58 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2001 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #12 | 1,814 | 1 | 22 | 1994 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2002 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #243 | 1,698 | 1 | 22 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #657 | 1,646 | 1 | 22 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,528 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2004 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #266 | 1,632 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #96 | 1,522 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #137 | 1,430 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,466 | 0 | 3 |