H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Guido Pella vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 0-1

Lukas Lacko holds a 1–0 lead over Guido Pella in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukas Lacko leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lukas Lacko won the 2021 Halle Open first round 6-7(5) 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guido Pella
ARG Age 36 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lukas Lacko #214 6-7(5) 7-5 6-1 Guido Pella #62 Match data Jun 17, 2021* R32 Halle Open ATP 500 Grass
Guido Pella #64 6-2 6-2 Lukas Lacko #124 Match data Oct 23, 2017 Q2 Q Vienna Open ATP 500 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guido Pella #1,079 #20 1,735 1,948 118 144 45.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guido Pella Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2012 0–1 0.0% #97 1,538 0 0 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2013 7–13 35.0% #118 1,642 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2014 3–4 42.9% #155 1,606 0 0 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2015 1–4 20.0% #74 1,655 0 0 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2016 14–22 38.9% #80 1,689 0 0 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2017 16–15 51.6% #64 1,802 0 0 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2018 23–22 51.1% #58 1,753 0 0 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2019 34–25 57.6% #25 1,842 0 1 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2020 5–8 38.5% #43 1,762 0 1 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2021 6–17 26.1% #74 1,691 0 1 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
33 2023 9–13 40.9% #192 1,666 0 1 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guido Pella Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2013 2 5 7 28.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2014 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2015 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2016 5 10 15 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2017 10 10 20 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2018 6 9 15 40.0% 13 10 23 56.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2019 9 13 22 40.9% 21 9 30 70.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2020 2 2 4 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
31 2021 4 6 10 40.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2023 2 4 6 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 42 65 107 39.3% 65 63 128 50.8% 11 16 27 40.7% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 260/262 of Guido Pella's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Guido Pella Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 2012 1/1 2.0 6.0 65.1% 60.7% 37.8% 42.9% 41.7% 52.7% 39.8% 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2013 20/20 3.8 2.9 57.5% 66.0% 47.0% 45.5% 34.7% 57.6% 32.3% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2014 7/7 4.7 1.9 60.1% 72.3% 52.6% 67.1% 43.7% 64.8% 30.9% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2015 5/5 5.6 3.2 68.3% 70.8% 47.9% 69.0% 52.8% 63.5% 31.1% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2016 35/36 5.4 2.9 67.7% 68.9% 54.4% 65.4% 36.1% 64.3% 36.6% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2017 31/31 4.8 2.4 65.4% 69.4% 51.4% 66.0% 39.7% 63.1% 38.5% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2018 45/45 6.4 1.9 64.6% 70.9% 53.4% 59.0% 37.4% 64.6% 37.8% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2019 58/59 4.9 2.2 66.5% 68.1% 54.0% 59.8% 39.8% 63.4% 38.0% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2020 13/13 4.5 3.4 65.9% 68.0% 50.6% 54.8% 35.2% 61.9% 36.1% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 2021 23/23 4.4 2.7 66.1% 61.8% 42.6% 55.0% 49.7% 55.5% 37.3% 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
33 2023 22/22 3.3 2.7 67.9% 66.5% 52.0% 58.4% 37.8% 61.7% 34.7% 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
Career — 260/262 4.9 2.5 65.4% 68.1% 51.5% 59.6% 39.3% 62.3% 36.6% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guido Pella Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2007 1507 96.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1491 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 2010 1494 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 2012 1539 110.6 +0.61 -1.90 0.842 46.7% — — — 25.0% -1.25 — — — -0.05 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) 101.4 -0.83
23 2013 1642 131.3 -2.91 -2.48 0.762 45.6% -26 +48 — 32.6% -1.43 3–1 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 106.1 -0.64 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 101.1 -0.54
24 2014 1606 118.6 +0.41 -1.48 0.878 48.0% -15 +90 — 43.8% -0.69 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.04 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 -0.47
25 2015 1655 120.5 -0.42 -0.06 0.852 47.9% +3 — — 23.1% -0.69 1–1 0–5 (0%) — -0.41 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 103.0 -0.64
26 2016 1690 147.1 +0.77 +0.51 1.023 50.5% -21 +15 — 43.0% -0.13 7–12 (37%) 7–16 (30%) 92.7 -1.08 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 98.2 -0.19
27 2017 1802 149.2 -0.11 +1.80 1.043 50.8% -42 +6 — 52.5% +0.14 5–8 (38%) 11–9 (55%) 101.8 -0.90 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.4 -0.16
28 2018 1754 143.3 +0.84 +1.15 1.066 50.8% -73 +104 -89 50.0% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 9–11 (45%) 102.0 -0.37 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2019 1843 153.6 -0.25 +1.74 1.038 50.6% -140 +100 -43 54.1% +0.18 16–8 (67%) 17–8 (68%) 110.8 +0.93 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2020 1763 121.2 -1.57 -0.69 0.948 49.1% -67 +50 — 43.6% -0.31 1–3 (25%) 4–6 (40%) 95.3 -0.02 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +1.00
31 2021 1691 134.0 -5.10 +0.25 0.838 46.9% +29 +26 +12 33.3% -1.08 1–3 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 96.2 -1.34 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1666 121.1 -2.21 -0.99 0.906 48.3% +3 -11 +77 39.1% -0.52 6–3 (67%) 4–7 (36%) 100.0 +0.80 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1948 145.9 -0.76 +0.54 0.972 49.5% -52 +57 -21 45.7% -0.23 51–48 (52%) 63–74 (46%) 101.6 -1.20 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.