H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Guido Pella vs Milos Raonic H2H: 1-0
Guido Pella holds a 1–0 lead over Milos Raonic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guido Pella leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Guido Pella won the 2019 Wimbledon fourth round 3-6 4-6 6-3 7-6(3) 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2019* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Guido Pella | 3-6 4-6 6-3 7-6(3) 8-6 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guido Pella | #1,079 | #20 | 1,735 | 1,945 | 115 | 142 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guido Pella | Milos Raonic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #97 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #155 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2017 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #64 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #58 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2019 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #25 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2021 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #74 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #192 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |