H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Guido Pella vs Santiago Giraldo H2H: 1-0
Guido Pella holds a 1–0 lead over Santiago Giraldo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guido Pella leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guido Pella won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro fourth round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
COL
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2016* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Guido Pella | 6-4 6-0 | Santiago Giraldo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guido Pella | #1,079 | #20 | 1,735 | 1,945 | 115 | 142 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Santiago Giraldo | #1,242 | #28 | 1,230 | 1,929 | 141 | 185 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guido Pella | Santiago Giraldo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #163 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #97 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #64 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #55 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #155 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #57 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #69 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #32 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #64 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #70 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #58 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #91 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #25 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #227 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #253 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #74 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #192 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |