H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Guillermo Perez-Roldan vs Ronald Agenor H2H: 3-1
Guillermo Perez-Roldan holds a 3–1 lead over Ronald Agenor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Perez-Roldan leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Ronald Agenor won the 1991 Gstaad third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 56
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
HAI
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 1991* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ronald Agenor | 6-4 6-4 | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | Match data |
| May 16, 1990* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | 6-7 6-2 6-4 | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
| Apr 19, 1990* | Nice | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | 1-6 6-3 6-4 | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
| May 15, 1988* | Rome | Masters 1000 | SF | Clay | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | 6-3 6-3 | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Perez-Roldan | #1,461 | #13 | 1,222 | 1,932 | 236 | 129 | 64.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Ronald Agenor | #1,507 | #22 | 984 | 1,895 | 215 | 251 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | Ronald Agenor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1986 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #109 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 40–15 | 72.7% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #18 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #32 | 1,808 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #14 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #49 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,646 | 0 | 8 | 1987 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #82 | 1,755 | 0 | 9 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #28 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #37 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #29 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #420 | 1,650 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #74 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #132 | 1,538 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #58 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,528 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #96 | 1,522 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #137 | 1,430 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,466 | 0 | 3 |